Free Website Hosting
Showing posts with label Information Technology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Information Technology. Show all posts

Friday, September 11, 2009

Jobs in Fighting Form After Liver Transplant

Published: September 9, 2009

SAN FRANCISCO — After a prolonged absence from the public eye, a thin but energetic Steven P. Jobs reappeared Wednesday at an Apple news conference and addressed his illness in personal terms for the first time.

Skip to next paragraph
Jteff Chiu/Associated Press

On Wednesday, Steven P. Jobs talked about his illness and introduced a new iPod Nano.

Multimedia

Steven P. Jobs Makes AppearanceVideo

Steven P. Jobs Makes Appearance

Today's Business: Brad Stone on the Reappearance of Steve Jobs

Comment Post a Comment on the Bits Blog

Robert Galbraith/Reuters

After a five-month absence, Mr. Jobs said, “I’m back at Apple and I’m loving every day of it.”

“I feel great. I probably need to gain about 30 pounds, but I feel really good,” said Mr. Jobs, Apple’s chief executive, in an interview after the event. “I’m eating like crazy. A lot of ice cream.”

At the music-themed event, Apple introduced new iTunes software and a new line of iPod Nano music players with video cameras. But the product announcements were eclipsed by the public return of Mr. Jobs, five months after he received a liver transplant at a hospital in Tennessee. Mr. Jobs needed the operation after suffering from complications from a rare form of pancreatic cancer.

“I’m vertical, I’m back at Apple and I’m loving every day of it,” he said on stage, after a standing ovation from the crowd, which included Apple employees and journalists gathered for the news conference.

The applause “was an endearing statement for someone who is clearly still recovering,” said Gerry Purdy, a wireless analyst at Frost & Sullivan who has covered the mobile computing industry for 20 years. “You just feel like this is an opportunity to share in the greatness of someone who is an icon in the industry.”

Mr. Jobs, who appeared as gaunt as he was when he went on a leave of absence in January, immediately addressed the matter of his health.

“I’m very happy to be here, and thank you all,” he said. “As some of you know, five months ago I had a liver transplant. I now have the liver of a mid-20s person who died in a car crash and was generous enough to donate their organs. I wouldn’t be here without such generosity, so I hope all of us can be as generous and elect to be organ donors.”

But after that gentle opening, Apple’s chief executive, who wore his characteristic outfit of jeans and a black turtleneck, was as tough as ever. He used the news conference to take jabs at competing products from Microsoft, Sony, Nintendo, Dell and Cisco Systems.

Mr. Jobs’s public return will reassure many Apple fans and shareholders, who view the charismatic co-founder of the company as crucial to Apple’s success.

“Apple users and investors think the world of Steve Jobs and the world of Apple products, and that he was here today is a statement that he is back in charge,” said Gene Munster, an analyst at Piper Jaffray. “The wizard of Oz is back in Oz.”

The actual products announced Wednesday were not nearly as magical as recent hits like the iPhone.

Apple announced a new version of its iTunes software that will allow users to better organize their applications for the iPhone and the iPod Touch and to share music and videos among up to five computers in the home.

The company also introduced a line of iPod Nanos that have a video camera, microphone, speaker, FM radio tuner and pedometer and start at $149.

Mr. Jobs drew a sharp comparison between the Nanos, which are the size of a five-pack of chewing gum, and Cisco’s popular Flip video cameras, which are the size of a pack of playing cards. The new Nano is an effort to turn around sales of the iPod, which have been sluggish for the first time and which actually declined 7 percent in the last quarter from a year earlier.

“They need something to reinvigorate the line and give people another reason to have an iPod,” said Charles S. Golvin, an analyst focusing on mobile and consumer electronics at Forrester Research.

Jonathan Kaplan, senior vice president for consumer products at Cisco, said his company was flattered by the attention from Mr. Jobs but said that the Flip camera records video in high definition, while the Nano represents “last generation’s technology.”

“This will help consumers realize it’s not all about photography, that video can make a difference in the world,” Mr. Kaplan said. “It’s nice that Apple is finally realizing that video is a place they need to be.”

Apple also pitched a cheaper, $199 version of the iPod Touch with more memory but did not announce, as some had expected, a new version with a video camera.

In the interview, Mr. Jobs said that Apple had been originally unsure how to market the iPod Touch, but settled on selling it as a video game device that can take advantage of the many free or cheap games available in the company’s App Store. “We don’t need to add new stuff,” he said. “We need to get the price down where everyone can afford it.”

Despite much speculation by Apple fans, the company made no announcements about a tablet-size computer or reading device.

But in the interview, Mr. Jobs said general-purpose devices are more appealing than specialized devices like Amazon.com’s Kindle e-book reader.

“I think people just probably aren’t willing to pay for a dedicated device,” he said. “You notice Amazon never says how much they sell; usually if they sell a lot of something, you want to tell everybody.”

Apple’s shares, which rose in the days leading to the news conference, fell about 1 percent in Wednesday’s trading, closing at $171.14.

Claire Cain Miller contributed reporting.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

Wikipedia to Limit Changes to Articles on People

By NOAM COHEN
Published: August 24, 2009

Wikipedia, one of the 10 most popular sites on the Web, was founded about eight years ago as a long-shot experiment to create a free encyclopedia from the contributions of volunteers, all with the power to edit, and presumably improve, the content.

Skip to next paragraph
Minh Uong/The New York Times

Related

Times Topics: Wikipedia

Mark Humphrey/Associated Press

Wikipedia’s entry on John Seigenthaler Sr. once connected him falsely to two assassinations.

Michael Caronna/Reuters

Jimmy Wales, a founder of Wikipedia, said the new policy would be treated as a test.

Readers' Comments

Readers shared their thoughts on this article.

Now, as the English-language version of Wikipedia has just surpassed three million articles, that freewheeling ethos is about to be curbed.

Officials at the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit in San Francisco that governs Wikipedia, say that within weeks, the English-language Wikipedia will begin imposing a layer of editorial review on articles about living people.

The new feature, called “flagged revisions,” will require that an experienced volunteer editor for Wikipedia sign off on any change made by the public before it can go live. Until the change is approved — or in Wikispeak, flagged — it will sit invisibly on Wikipedia’s servers, and visitors will be directed to the earlier version.

The change is part of a growing realization on the part of Wikipedia’s leaders that as the site grows more influential, they must transform its embrace-the-chaos culture into something more mature and dependable.

Roughly 60 million Americans visit Wikipedia every month. It is the first reference point for many Web inquiries — not least because its pages often lead the search results on Google, Yahoo and Bing. Since Michael Jackson died on June 25, for example, the Wikipedia article about him has been viewed more than 30 million times, with 6 million of those in the first 24 hours.

“We are no longer at the point that it is acceptable to throw things at the wall and see what sticks,” said Michael Snow, a lawyer in Seattle who is the chairman of the Wikimedia board. “There was a time probably when the community was more forgiving of things that were inaccurate or fudged in some fashion — whether simply misunderstood or an author had some ax to grind. There is less tolerance for that sort of problem now.”

The new editing procedures, which have been applied to the entire German-language version of Wikipedia during the last year, are certain to be a topic of discussion this week when Wikipedia’s volunteer editors gather in Buenos Aires for their annual Wikimania conference. Much of the agenda is focused on the implications of the encyclopedia’s size and influence.

Although Wikipedia has prevented anonymous users from creating new articles for several years now, the new flagging system crosses a psychological Rubicon. It will divide Wikipedia’s contributors into two classes — experienced, trusted editors, and everyone else — altering Wikipedia’s implicit notion that everyone has an equal right to edit entries.

That right was never absolute, and the policy changes are an extension of earlier struggles between control and openness.

For example, certain popular or controversial pages, like the ones for the singer Britney Spears and for President Obama, are frequently “protected” or “semi-protected,” limiting who, if anyone, can edit the articles.

And for seven months beginning in November, The New York Times worked with Wikipedia administrators to suppress information about the kidnapping of David Rohde, a correspondent in Afghanistan, from the article about him. The Times argued that the censorship would improve his chances of survival. Mr. Rohde escaped from his Taliban captors in June, but the episode dismayed some Wikipedia contributors.

The new system comes as some recent studies have found Wikipedia is no longer as attractive to first-time or infrequent contributors as it once was.

Ed H. Chi of the Palo Alto Research Center in California, which specializes in research for commercial endeavors, recently completed a study of the millions of changes made to Wikipedia in a month. He concluded that the site’s growth (whether in new articles, new edits or new contributors) hit a plateau in 2007-8.

For some active Wikipedia editors, this was an expected development — after so many articles, naturally there are fewer topics to uncover, and those new topics are not necessarily of general interest.

But Mr. Chi also found that the changes made by more experienced editors were more likely to stay up on the site, whereas one-time editors had a much higher chance of having their edits reversed. He concluded that there was “growing resistance from the Wikipedia community to new content.”

To other observers, the new flagging system reflects Wikipedia’s necessary acceptance of the responsibility that comes with its vast influence.

“Wikipedia now has the ability to alter the world that it attempts to document,” said Joseph Reagle, an adjunct professor of communications at New York University whose Ph.D. thesis was about the history of Wikipedia.

Under the current system, it is not difficult to insert false information into a Wikipedia entry, at least for a short time. In March, for example, a 22-year-old Irish student planted a false quotation attributed to the French composer Maurice Jarre shortly after Mr. Jarre’s death. It was promptly included in obituaries about Mr. Jarre in several newspapers, including The Guardian and The Independent in Britain. And on Jan. 20, vandals changed the entries for two ailing senators, Edward M. Kennedy and Robert C. Byrd, to report falsely that they had died.

Flagged revisions, advocates say, could offer one more chance to catch such hoaxes and improve the overall accuracy of Wikipedia’s entries.

Foundation officials intend to put the system into effect first with articles about living people because those pieces are ripe for vandalism and because malicious information within them can be devastating to those individuals.

Exactly who will have flagging privileges has not yet been determined, but the editors will number in the thousands, Wikipedia officials say. With German Wikipedia, nearly 7,500 people have the right to approve a change. The English version, which has more than three times as many articles, would presumably need even more editors to ensure that changes do not languish before approval.

“It is a test,” said Jimmy Wales, a founder of Wikipedia. “We will be interested to see all the questions raised. How long will it take for something to be approved? Will it take a couple of minutes, days, weeks?”

Mr. Wales began pushing for the policy after the Kennedy and Byrd hoaxes, but discussions about a review system date back to one of the darkest episodes in Wikipedia’s history, known as the Seigenthaler incident.

In 2005, the prominent author and journalist John Seigenthaler Sr. discovered that Wikipedia’s biographical article connected him to the assassinations of John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy, a particularly scurrilous thing to report because he was personally close to the Kennedy family.

Since then, Wikipedians have been fanatical about providing sources for facts, with teams of editors adding the label “citation needed” to any sentence without a footnote.

“We have really become part of the infrastructure of how people get information,” Mr. Wales said. “There is a serious responsibility we have.”