Free Website Hosting

Wednesday, December 31, 2008

Coming Soon: The 21st Century

By E. J. Dionne Jr.
Tuesday, December 30, 2008; Page A15

Social and political epochs rarely end precisely on schedules provided by calendars. Many historians date the end of Europe's 19th century to 1914 and the outbreak of World War I. What we call "The Sixties" in the United States, with its ethos of reform and protest, ended with Richard Nixon's landslide reelection in 1972 and the winding down of the Vietnam War.

In the same way, the outcome of this year's election means that 2009 will, finally, mark the beginning of the 21st century.

It comes as we face parlous economic conditions and a slew of new threats. Nonetheless, we should view this as an opportunity to embrace the words of one of Barack Obama's favorite presidents. "As our case is new, so we must think anew, and act anew," Abraham Lincoln declared in 1862. "We must disenthrall ourselves, and then we shall save our country."

For all the chatter about the world changing decisively after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, our reaction to the attacks was conditioned by 20th-century assumptions.
ad_icon

Instead of seeing the spasm of violence as representing something entirely new, President Bush's administration, aided by thinkers sympathetic to its approach, resolutely forced events into the interpretive boxes fashioned in previous decades.

Reactionary terrorists whose actions reflected the weakness of their position were raised up to world-historical status. They were "totalitarians," which suggested that they represented a threat as powerful as those embodied by Hitler and Stalin. They were "Islamofascists," a sobriquet that credited them with battling under the banner of a coherent, modern ideology when in fact they were inspired by a ragtag jumble of ideas rooted in the medieval past.

Osama bin Laden's commitment to reviving the power of the old Islamic "caliphate" was taken to be as real as the danger of Soviet troops pouring across the old East German border or of Hitler occupying Czechoslovakia. The new "global war on terror" was endowed with the same coherence as the old Cold War.

It was a dangerous and self-defeating set of illusions. Our battle with the terrorists is difficult precisely because it doesn't fit into the familiar categories. It grows out of struggles within Islam over which we have little control -- between Shiites and Sunnis, between modernizing and reactionary forces, between old regimes and new contenders for power.

It involves the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, which, as the battle in Gaza shows, always threatens to fly out of control. But it also involves the struggle over Kashmir, as the attacks in Mumbai demonstrated, and the fears of Iranian-Shiite power in the Gulf.

None of this makes our situation easier, and it will certainly not make the danger of terrorism go away. But it does highlight the urgency of disenthralling ourselves from dated ideas.

So, too, does the rise of a new architecture of power in the world with the emergence especially of India and China. Fareed Zakaria says his book "The Post-American World" is not "about the decline of America," even if its catchy title suggests otherwise, but he's right to think anew about American influence.

What should fall is another illusion, the idea that the United States is the world's "sole remaining superpower." This notion weakened us because it suggested an omnipotence that no nation can possess.

By shedding this misapprehension, the United States could restore its influence. We could rediscover the imperative of acting in concert with others to build global institutions that strengthen our security and foster our values.

Nowhere is the need for a new understanding more obvious than in economic matters. Capitalism will not disappear, but the current crash has destroyed a series of damaging myths.

Those brilliant financiers were not so brilliant after all and certainly did not deserve the outsized rewards our system showered upon them for three decades. They did not understand that the financial instruments they created contained time bombs that would eventually rip apart the very system from which they so profited.

The market cannot operate without significant regulation, and dreaded government turns out to be the only institution with the capacity to repair things when market actors are routed from the field and sit, petrified, at the sidelines.

Barack Obama will have as free a hand as history ever allows to chart a new course and to define a new era. He may or may not succeed, but the country was right to seize the opportunity he offered to put the previous century and its assumptions behind us.

A Job or a Gang?

Editorial

Published: December 29, 2008

If the country has learned anything about street gangs, it is that police dragnets — hauling large numbers of nonviolent young people off to jail, along with the troublemakers — tend to make the problem worse, not better. Public policy should discourage young people from joining gangs in the first place by keeping them in school, getting them jobs and giving them community-based counseling and social service programs.

Federal and state programs that are supposed to provide jobs, services and counseling have been poorly financed for years. They are likely to suffer further as cash-strapped states look for ways to save money. The timing couldn’t be worse.

A new study by James Alan Fox and Marc Swatt of Northeastern University suggests that violent crime among young people may be rising, that the much-talked-about reduction in the crime rate in the 1990s may be over, and that much more must be done to prevent young people from succumbing to the gang culture.

The study also shows that the murder rate for black teenagers has climbed noticeably since 2000 while the rate for young whites has scarcely changed on the whole and, in some places, has actually declined. While more financing for local police would be useful, programs aimed at providing jobs and social services are far more important.

It is too early to say whether the numbers represent a long-term trend. But the economic crisis has clearly created the conditions for more crime and more gangs — among hopeless, jobless young men in the inner cities. Once these young men become entangled in the criminal justice system, they are typically marginalized and shut out of the job market for life.

President-elect Barack Obama’s administration and Congress will need to address the youth crisis as part of the country’s deep economic crisis. That means reviving the federal summer jobs programs that ran successfully for more than 30 years. It also means directing more federal money at proven programs that keep young people in school and out of the clutches of the gangs.

Amid a Buildup of Its Forces, Israel Ponders a Cease-Fire

Khalil Hamra/Associated Press
Relatives Tuesday at the funeral of two sisters killed in an airstrike. More than 370 Palestinians have died, Palestinians say. More Photos >
Published: December 30, 2008
JERUSALEM — With its punishing air attacks on Gaza about to enter a fifth day, its gunboats gathering near the Gaza port and its ground forces poised for imminent action, Israel said Tuesday that it was considering a 48-hour cease-fire that would also require Hamas to stop its rocket fire.
The idea was in an early stage, a result of a conversation between Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner of France and Defense Minister Ehud Barak of Israel seeking at least a temporary pause in the fighting that would allow humanitarian relief to be delivered to the besieged coastal strip. Aides to Mr. Barak said he was interested in exploring it and would do so with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the rest of the cabinet on Wednesday.
“The leading option right now is still a ground invasion, but the target of this operation is an improved cease-fire, and if that can come without the invasion, fine,” said a close aide to Mr. Barak, speaking on the condition of anonymity because he is not Mr. Barak’s authorized spokesman. “But, of course, Hamas has to agree, and there has to be a mechanism to make it work.”
In Paris, where Mr. Kouchner was meeting with his European Union colleagues over the Gaza crisis, he called publicly for a permanent cease-fire. A similar call came from the so-called quartet of powers focused on the region — the United Nations, the European Union, the United States and Russia.
President Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice made phone calls to Israeli and Arab leaders to explore prospects for halting the fighting. They emphasized that any cease-fire should be “durable and sustainable,” compelling Hamas to end its rocket attacks, a State Department spokesman said.
“That is different from the cease-fire that existed in the last six months,” said the spokesman, Gordon Duguid, noting that Hamas had routinely violated the previous agreement by firing rockets into southern Israel.
The flurry of diplomacy appeared to be mostly byplay in Jerusalem and Gaza, as Israeli officials spoke of a continuing and expanding military operation, and Hamas vowed to step up its resistance. Israeli warplanes attacked tunnels used to smuggle supplies in southern Gaza and destroyed the home of a top militant leader.
Mr. Olmert told the Israeli president, Shimon Peres, that the airstrikes were the first of several planned phases, according to spokesmen for the officials. It was also clear that the number of targets available from the air was declining, making the likelihood of a ground offensive greater.
In Gaza, Hamas militants issued a taped statement vowing revenge for those killed in the Israeli air raids since Saturday and warning that a ground invasion would prove painful for Israel. Palestinian officials say that more than 370 people have been killed, among them, the United Nations says, at least 62 women and children and an unknown number of civilian men. Two sisters, ages 4 and 11, were killed in a strike in the north as concern was growing around the world that the assault was taking a terrible toll on civilians.
“It would be easier to dry the sea of Gaza than to defeat the resistance and uproot Hamas, which is in every house of Gaza,” said the statement from the military wing of Hamas. It was played on Hamas’s television station, which had been shut down by an Israeli missile but went back on the air by broadcasting from a mobile van. The statement added that if there was a ground invasion, “the children of Gaza will be collecting the body parts of your soldiers and the ruins of tanks.”
Hamas continued to fire longer-range rockets at Israel, shooting deep into the city of Ashdod for a second day as well as into Beersheba, a major city in Israel’s south, where one landed in an empty kindergarten classroom. There was a report of light injuries as well as a number of people in shock.
Israeli warplanes, returning repeatedly to the same section of Gaza City overnight, pummeled the main government complex with about 20 missiles, residents said Tuesday. The building had been evacuated since the start of the operation on Saturday, which also hit nearly all of Hamas’s security complexes, its university and other symbols of its sovereignty and power.
The Nakhala family, which lives next to the compound, was inspecting the damage on Tuesday morning and recounting the utter fear and panic they all felt as the missiles hit.
“We have no shelters in Gaza,” said the father, Osama Nakhala. “Where shall we go? I also have to worry about my mother, who is 80 years old and paralyzed.”
His 13-year-old son, Yousef, was with him. When asked his view of the situation, Yousef took an unusual stand for someone in Gaza, where Israel is being cursed by most everyone. “I blame Hamas. It doesn’t want to recognize Israel. If they did so there could be peace,” he said. “Egypt made a peace treaty with Israel, and nothing is happening to them.”
His brother Amjad, 16, disagreed and blamed the Palestinian president in the West Bank, Mahmoud Abbas, saying that he had sided with Israel.
Gaza City was entirely without electricity for the first time, the result of an air attack that hit the system’s infrastructure. Repair workers said they were afraid to work because of the possibility of more raids.
The few open bakeries and grocery stores had lines stretching outside as people tried to stock up. But essentials, like diapers, baby food, bread, potatoes and fresh vegetables, were in short supply and costlier than normal.
Israel sent in about 100 trucks with emergency supplies of food and medicine, the military reported.
At the Hassouna Bakery near Shifa Hospital, about 100 men and 50 women waited in separate lines to buy bread. Amal Altayan was telling others in the line that she kept her cellphone in her pocket so that if an Israeli missile destroyed her house she would be able to phone for help. The other women mocked her, saying that if a missile hit her house, she would be gone. Showing familiarity with the kind of knowledge circulating in Gaza these days, Ms. Altayan replied, “It depends. If it is an F-16 I will turn into biscuits, but if it is an Apache I may have a chance.”
Osama Alaf, 41, said he spent four hours waiting in line to buy bread. “I bought flour until now,” he said. “I don’t have cooking gas, but I make a fire out of cartons and paper and make bread that way.” Asked whom he blamed, he said, “Israel, which is slaughtering us, and whoever is cooperating with Israel, like Egypt.”
Anger at Egypt has grown across the Arab and Muslim worlds because it has declined to open its border with Gaza and is seen as cooperating with Israel.
Ethan Bronner reported from Jerusalem, and Taghreed El-Khodary from Gaza. Mark Landler contributed reporting from Washington.

Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Islam 'booming' in America

The survey was done by the Council on American-Islamic relations

The first comprehensive survey of Muslims in the United States has revealed that the community has grown to more than six million, with 1,200 mosques across the country.

In a report due to be released on Thursday, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, found that mosques are increasingly less bound by ethnic and racial divisions than in the past, and are adapting to US culture.

Islam in America

1,209 mosques

6-7 million US Muslims

411,000 attend Friday prayers

87% of mosques founded since 1970

The survey excluded movements that mainstream Muslims do not consider as being truly Islamic, such as the black rights leader, Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Islam.

The report found that many Muslims remain ambivalent about America, admiring its technological advances while disparaging its culture.

Researchers also discovered that women attended Friday prayers, and served on many governing boards of mosques - almost unheard of in many Muslim societies

First insight

The study - led by Professor Ihsan Bagby from the University of Raleigh in North Carolina - was designed to provide the first clear insight into Islam in the US.

"Our mosques are much more diverse than we think," said Professor Bagby. But he added that they fell short of Islam's multi-racial ideal.

The survey started by compiling a list of all known orthodox mosques. Of these 1,209, some 631 were randomly selected and leaders from 416 responded to phone interviews conducted last year

Expressions of Islam in America
Gisela Webb introduces Islamic beliefs  and profiles America's Muslim communities.

The 1990s may be the last decade in which Islam is viewed as a "non-mainstream" religious tradition in America. At its current rate of growth, by the year 2015 Islam will be the second largest religion in the United States, following Christianity. There are approximately four million Muslims in the United States and 650 mosques. (1) Foreign-born Muslims and their descendants constitute about two thirds of those numbers; indigenous Americans (born in America), mostly African Americans, constitute the other third. (2) Islam is already the world's second largest religion, with 900 million members--about one sixth of the world's population--living in geographic regions that include, but extend far beyond, the Middle East. Islam is either the major religion or has large populations in such diverse cultural environments as Africa, Malaysia, and Indonesia, the former Soviet Union, Turkey, India and Pakistan, northwestern China and Europe.

Yet there is surprisingly little awareness or understanding of Islam in the American consciousness. What Americans do think about Islam tends to be formed by media images, specifically by the presence of one-sided negative imagery on the one hand ("Arab terrorists," "Islamic fundamentalists"), and by the absence of positive, or even neutral images on the other. American Muslims often express frustration over a situation that seems to be the last bastion of tolerated stereotyping. Clearly, the poor relationship between Islam and the "Christian West" has its roots in the confrontational and competitive history which Christianity and Islam have shared since Islam arose as a religious and political challenge to Christianity in the seventh century. The roots of confrontation also lie in the remembered history of the Crusades, in the relationship established during the colonial and the post-colonial periods (including the loss of Palestinian lands to Israel) and, now, in the heightened rhetoric and mistrust created by Muslims and "Westerners" alike, who would present Islam and "secular democracy" as polar opposites. Ideologues on both sides would like to present an image of a monolithic "Islam" with a unified agenda and clear leaders.

The reality is that the situation of Islam worldwide and in the United States, in particular, is extremely complex and shifting. Islam developed its forms of orthodoxy in the early history of the community. (3) There were, of course, different interpretations of basic principles derived from sacred scripture which led to a number of contending discourses in Islam (theological, juridical, philosophical, mystical, popular, political) as well as differing "styles" of Islam depending on the cultural milieu into which Islam was introduced. This complex reality is also the "process" of Islam in America. There have already been a number of stages in the development of an "American" Islam as well as a number of different groups and styles that constitute the Muslims of America.

There are three major constituents of Islam in America: immigrants, who bring Islam from their homelands; African-American converts to Islam; and the Sufi groups, the "spiritual confraternities" of Islam. This chapter will introduce the reader first to the central tenets of Islamic faith and practice and then to the historical development of certain segments of the Islamic community in America, namely, immigrant groups and African-American groups that see themselves as members of traditional or "orthodox" Islam. Sufism will also be treated in a separate chapter in this volume. It will be evident that there are a number of important issues facing American Muslim communities and individuals at this time, but they all point to the overarching question of how to define and manifest what "Islam" means in the midst of a secular, pluralistic, contemporary American culture.

Beliefs and Practices

The Islamic religion had its historic origin in the figure of Muhammad ibn Abdullah. Muhammad was born in the Arabian city of Mecca in 570 C.E. and was a member of the Quraysh tribe. According to traditional accounts, Muhammad was in the trading business, Mecca being a crossroads for many of the overland trade routes of the day, and was married to Khadija, his former employer who was fifteen years his senior. He was a reflective man and often meditated in a cave near Mt. Hira. From 610 through 632, when he died, Muhammad experienced a number of visions and "hearings," which he came to understand as true revelation (wahy) from the one God, Allah, which was communicated through the angel Gabriel. (4) These "revelations" began as warnings directed at the Meccans for their forgetfulness of God, for their polytheism and idolatry, and for the social and economic injustices of Meccan society. The revelations also warned of an inevitable judgment that all human beings would experience at the "Final Hour," an idea which was alien to the prevailing view of life and death in Arabian tribal culture. Muhammad understood his role to be that of the final prophet and messenger of God, and his message of submission (islam) to God's will as the same message that had been revealed to Abraham, Moses and all the other prophets of Jewish and Christian Scriptures as well as to the "prophets" of other peoples from the beginning of time. Jesus was seen as a prophet, born of the virgin Mary, and a special model of sanctity; but Christian claims of Jesus' divinity and "sonship" were rejected. The collection of Muhammad's revelations is the sacred book of Islam, the Quran. Muslims traditionally accept it as the authoritative word of God which "preexisted" eternally with God.

Muhammad began to preach in Mecca and, as a result of persecution, emigrated with a number of his followers to the city of Medina, where he established the paradigmatic "Islamic" community. The emigration (hijra) to Medina in 622 C.E. marks the beginning of the Islamic calendar. Muhammad eventually returned victorious to Mecca, clearing the Ka'ba--the pilgrimage site used by the many Arabian tribes of all idols in a symbolic act of reviving the original intention of the Ka'ba, which, according to tradition, had been built by Abraham and his son Ishmael to worship the One God, Allah.

The Quran and the example (sunna) of Muhammad became the main sources for the development of belief and practice in Islam. The Quran established the main articles of belief and practice, which are known as the Five Pillars of Islam. The first pillar is the shahada, the affirmation that "There is no God but God (La ilaha illa Allah), and Muhammad is His Prophet." The shahada is normally understood as stressing the utter transcendence and distinction of God "above" all created orders, although the Sufis would traditionally interpret the shahada as affirming that ultimately only God can be called "the Real." The shahada is also seen as affirming the authenticity of God's prophets and holy books, the angels, the jinn (invisible creatures created out of "fire"), and the final judgment of one's deeds and consignment to heaven or hell. The five pillars also include the basic duties of Muslims. Thus, the second pillar consists of the salat, the liturgical prayers said in Arabic five times daily, facing Mecca. On Fridays, Muslims gather in mosques for congregational recitation of prayers. The salat prayers create the basic orientation of time and space for Muslims. Arabic became the sacred language of Islam and an important unifying element for Muslims throughout the world. With the third pillar, the zakat, or charity tax, Muslims are required to pay a yearly tax of 2.5 percent of one's holdings for the care of the society's poor. The fourth pillar is sawm, or fasting--refraining from all food and liquid--from sunrise to sunset each day during the lunar month of Ramadan. It is a time of inner reflection and training of the nafs, the "lower self," as well as of experiencing something of the hunger of the poor. Finally, Muslims are required to make the hajj, the pilgrimage to Mecca once in their lives so long as it is not a financial burden. The primary ritual of the hajj is the circumambulation of the Ka'ba, which is seen as a reenactment of Muhammad's "clearing the idols" as well as symbolic of the ideal of the "unity of humankind" that has attracted so many marginalized peoples to Islam. Muslim men and women arrive in Mecca from virtually every race, class, and ethnic group, shedding their outer garments for a plain white shroud-a symbol of equality as well as the Muslim death shroud-and begin their common "journey to the center."

In principle, there is no division between religious and secular law in Islam. All of life is to be oriented toward the Divine Will. The shariah, or Islamic law, was developed to provide specific guidelines for all areas of life, from religious ritual (e.g., requirements in prayer) to sexuality (e.g., no premarital sex) to political principles (e.g., rules of war) to dietary restrictions (e.g., no pork, no alcohol). Of course, the shariah is based on interpretation of the Quran, the remembered history of Muhammad's actions, and the cultural customs of the geographic regions in which the shariah developed during the eighth and ninth centuries. It is not surprising that a major area of contemporary discussion among Muslims is the issue of reinterpreting the shariah in light of considerations of modernity. The variety of Islamic "revival" and "reform" movements that have emerged in the contemporary Islamic world (often inaccurately lumped together under such terms as "radical" or "fundamentalist") (5) have tended to see the political, social, and economic ills of the Islamic world as indications that Muslims have fallen away-because of infatuation with the West or corruption of their own leaders from the moral and civic principles of the shariah, and that a return to an "Islamic" way of life, the shariah, would revitalize both Islamic society and, ultimately, the world community. However, it is this same activist spirit that has led to disagreement over "what," or "whose," version of Islam is correct, as well as how the shariah should be implemented. (6) The issue of interpretation is particularly crucial in the area of the rights and treatment of women. Muslim women writers, both in America and abroad, often point to the curtailed role of women in the post-Muhammadan community in comparison with the egalitarian thrust of the Quran itself and the more active participation of women in the early Muslim community. (7) Thus, the issue of "women and the veil" is symbolic of discussions that have become particularly important for Muslims in America. In addition to the shariah, many customs have spread throughout the Islamic world which Muslims see as rooted in the example of Muhammad, and which they feel incumbent to cultivate-for example, modesty, hospitality, and respect for teachers and elders.

Two major branches of Islam developed early in the community's history in response to the question of succession of authority after Muhammad's death. Sunni Islam and Shi'ite Islam reflect two approaches to politics and rule. Shi'ites believe that Muhammad's charisma--and hence, political and spiritual guidance--was continued in the bloodline of Ali (Muhammad's cousin and son-in-law) and his descendants, the Shi'ite imams (leaders). Shi'ites believe in the continued guidance from the final imam (although different sects of Shi'ites disagree on whether that was the fifth, the seventh, or the twelfth in the line of succession), and tradition maintains that he will return as the mahdi to usher in the Day of Judgment. About 20 percent of all Muslims, mostly from Iran and southern Lebanon are Shi'ites. (8) The other 80 percent, the majority of Muslims, are Sunnis, for whom selection of leaders is supposed to take place through representatives (originally the tribal elders) of the people. (9) Both Sunnis and Shi'ites are considered "orthodox."

Within both Sunni and Shi'ite communities of Islam there emerged spiritual confraternities, the Sufi groups, or tariqas, which were centered on the teachings of certain pious individuals. These charismatic figures taught a "subtle wisdom" tradition of interpreting the Quran and the traditions of the Prophet. The Sufi groups developed a variety of approaches to Islamic spirituality--ecstatic, contemplative, devotional, poetic, musical, chivalrous--the goal of which was both purity of devotion and attainment of a unitive experience of God. The Sufis contributed much to the development of the esoteric sciences of the medieval period (alchemy, subtle psychology), popular forms of piety, and the arts-literary, visual, musical, and poetic. While the Sufis at times strained the boundaries of "orthodoxy" with some of their teachings, their presence has been a historical constant in Islamic societies. They are recognized for their importance as transmitters of Islam to lands far from the original "heartland" of Islam. See "Sufism in America" in this volume.

The beliefs and practices of Sunnis and Shi'ites, of Sufis and non-Sufis, came to the shores of America with the arrival of immigrant populations, traditions brought by slaves, and popular Sufi teachers from "the East."

Muslims in America--Immigrant Communities

About two thirds of all Muslims in the United States are immigrants and their descendants. (10) Muslim immigrants, both Sunnis and Shi'ites, arrived in waves beginning in the late 1800s, the first groups coming from what are now Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, and Palestine. Communities began to form in the industrial centers of the Midwest-Toledo, Cedar Rapids, Detroit, Michigan City, and Chicago. Most of these immigrants were uneducated and unskilled workers who sought economic opportunities in the United States. The extended families of these immigrants became the founders of the first mosques in North America. These first mosque communities functioned primarily to maintain social bonds, offer solidarity in this new land, and provide community space for rites of passage. (11)

Another wave of immigrants arrived between 1947 and 1960 and included Muslims from the Middle East as well as from India, Pakistan, Eastern Europe, and the Soviet Union. Some were children of ruling elites; some were refugees; many came solely for higher education. (12)

The individuals comprising the last wave, from 1967 to the present, have come for both political and economic reasons. Many, especially Pakistanis and Arabs, are educated professionals. Substantial numbers of Iranians came prior to and after their country's revolution. A number of other countries are represented in this wave: Yemen, Lebanon, Egypt, Jordan, Turkistan-Turkey, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Afghanistan. (13) The most recent arrivals are from the Sudan, Uganda, Guyana, Bermuda, and the former Yugoslavia.

Development of Islamic community life in America corresponded to the political and social concerns of particular immigrant groups. Earlier Muslim immigrants saw mosque life mostly in terms of social needs, and imams (leaders) of local congregations were not always trained as religious teachers. Thus, little emphasis was placed upon strict observance of traditional mosque functions. Adaptations were made to conform to American church patterns, such as scheduling congregational prayers on Sundays and allowing "mixed" (men and women) social functions, such as dances.

Later groups of immigrants brought the heightened religious and political self-consciousness that has been part of the legacy of the loss and occupation of Palestinian lands. (14) These Muslims came with commitments to a variety of religio-political ideologies and with more religious training, usually more conservative, than their predecessors in America. Tension points developed in some of the earlier mosque communities as more recent and conservative Muslim arrivals attempted to correct their more Americanized brothers and sisters in areas of Islamic practice and custom.

In general, Muslims in America who have been raised in traditional Muslim cultures speak of the tension they experience in trying to remain close to linguistic, cultural, ethnic, and religious roots while trying to develop a sense of belonging in their adopted home. American societal patterns are often at odds with needs of Muslim life and practice: Work schedules do not easily allow for the five-times-daily salat prayers or Friday congregational prayers. Institutional eating facilities (schools, prisons, military) are not set up for Muslim dietary practices. The pervasiveness of alcohol in America and the cultural acceptance of sexual permissiveness and immodesty (in clothing and comportment) are seen as negative influences on the faith community, particularly on its young people. (15) The shariah, however, continues to be held as the ideal pattern of life to be striven for, somehow, in the midst of contemporary American culture.

Mosque governance in America appears to be taking the pattern of some Protestant denominations, such as the Baptists, in which each community has autonomy in deciding its local leadership and ideological orientation, but in which each member and each community shares a commitment to sacred scripture as the ultimate source of guidance in areas of belief and practice. (16) American mosques, unlike mosques in Islamic countries, are self-supporting, and therefore they must rely on membership contributions or fund-raising activities. The imam of the American mosque often finds himself in a role that goes beyond the traditional function of reciter of prayers. He may assume additional roles, common to American pastors, such as administrative and counseling responsibilities.

There are a variety of styles and emphases in mosque communities of the United States. Some mosques function in the way of America's small, urban ethnic churches, in which ethnic ties are emphasized, cultivated, and preserved. These communities function as centers for learning and sharing information about surviving in America as much as they function as centers for prayer. Other mosques, while being centers for prayer and social activities, also emphasize "outreach," utilizing the Islamic cultural tradition of hospitality in order to establish communication and goodwill with the surrounding community. (17) Mosques in the Midwest, such as the Islamic Center of Toledo, Ohio, are known for this approach. More recently established mosque communities, such as the Islamic Society of Central Jersey, have taken this approach as well, particularly in light of escalating fears of Islam and Muslims. (18) The focus of their work is in correcting misunderstandings about Islam by inviting non-Muslim groups to their facilities and by offering lectures and programs. Finally, a new trend has emerged in America: the large "mega-mosques" that serve the needs of large, rapidly growing, racially and ethnically diverse communities, such as in the Los Angeles area. (19) These mosques most clearly reflect the historical pluralism within the Islamic community as well as the continually widening ethnic pluralism of the United States.

There are a number of active Islamic organizations that exist alongside the mosque communities. In the middle of this century, the Muslim population was still small and dispersed over the continent. The need for a unifying organization led second-generation Muslim immigrants to form a federation of mosques that would provide a pooling of resources and contact with other communities. (20) It was originally called the Federation of Islamic Organizations; today it is the Federation of Islamic Associations in the United States and Canada, and its headquarters are in Detroit.

While the federation of mosques was taking shape within the earlier ethnic communities, Muslim student organizations were forming on college campuses. In 1963 the Muslim Student Association (MSA) was created to coordinate activities of the student groups. The MSA symbolized the international diversity of Islam as well as the ideological concerns of a more activist Islam worldwide. For these students, Islam was a way of life, a mission, and the organization's goal was to help create an ideal community and to serve Islam. (21) The MSA is still one of the largest and most well-organized Islamic organizations, and it has led to the creation of a number of other service and professional organizations designed to meet the needs of Muslims beyond the student community. Among them are the Muslim Community Association, American Muslim Social Scientists, Muslim Youth of North America, American Muslim Scientists and Engineers, Islamic Teaching Center, Islamic Medical Association, and the American Muslim Mission. These and other groups are now under the umbrella organization of the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA). The groups have their own committees and boards, but their administrative, legal, and financial affairs are linked at the center by ISNA's legislative body, the Majlis al-Shura. (22) ISNA groups sponsor national, zonal, and profession-specific congresses, where members engage in social, business, and intellectual exchange while maintaining connections with the larger international Islamic community.

One of the most important developments that characterizes the current Islamic community in America is the movement in the direction of political activity in the United States. While ISNA's leadership always tended to be individuals with affiliation to or backing by politically minded "Islamist" groups, such as the Ikhwan al-Muslimin and the Jammati-Islami, (23) there was never agreement on the appropriateness or the form of political action in the United States. Some of the more "ultraorthodox" movements (such as the Salafiyya, comprised mainly of Gulf Arabs and some African Americans) and some of the African-American "utopian separatists" felt reluctant to participate in the kufr ("unbelieving") American governmental system. (24) Nevertheless, in trying to offer some balance to the influence of the many pro-Israel political action committees, a number of Muslim PACs have emerged since 1985, including ISNA's own ISNA-PAC. In addition, a number of Muslim groups, such as the United Muslims of America and the Islamic Society of Greater Houston have encouraged participation in such mainstream American activities as registering and voting in elections, actively supporting candidates, and even running for office. One of the results of this public visibility in the political system is that Muslim candidates sometimes find criticism coming from conservative elements within the Muslim community for such things as not using an Islamic name, dressing in an "overly Western" manner, or making other concessions to American secular culture. (25) There are a number of Muslim organizations and activities which are not specifically political. Among them are da'wa (missionary, education, ministry) oriented groups, such as the Muslim World League and the Shi'ite-based Islamic Societies of Georgia and Virginia; the Muslim "thinktanks," such as the International Institute of Islamic Thought, formed in 1982 to promote "Islamic" scholarship and methodologies; and the National Committee on Islamic Affairs, which has begun to utilize the media as a forum for Muslim discussion on affairs in the Middle East.

There are also many Muslim "activist-scholars" in America who are engaged in critical examination of a wide variety of issues and assumptions related to "tradition" and "modernity" in Islam. These scholars often find themselves caught between cultures: they find it difficult to take scholarship back home to countries where ideological concerns rule the academic discourse; but they also find it difficult to challenge ideological assumptions that exist in American academia.

African-American Islam

Most of the "non-immigrant" Muslims in America are African-American converts to Islam. For many African Americans, Islam has become a means of self-definition and of "choosing" to identify with a religio-cultural system that was other than the one (the Christian West) that had failed in establishing a truly racially inclusive society. (26) Certainly the phenomenal growth of Islam among African Americans, even the injection Of Islamic themes into black popular culture (such as rap music), (27) is related to the meaning that "Islam" holds for many African Americans, namely, identifying with a religious faith that has affirmed their African heritage.

The roots of a "black Muslim" perspective can be traced back to Timothy Drew (Noble Drew Ali) and the founding of the Moorish American Science Temple in Newark in 1913, as well as to the emergence of the Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam. Certainly the most well-known convert to the Nation of Islam was Malcolm X, whose expositions of Elijah Muhammad's teachings were most influential in bringing membership to the Nation. (See Timothy Miller, "Black Jews and Black Muslims," this volume.) There were/ are some themes taught in the Nation of Islam that reflect traditional Islamic teachings: submission to Allah, the repudiation of such vices as alcohol, sex outside of marriage, the eating of pork, and gambling. However, such teachings as the "white man as devil" and the quasi-scientific theory of the origins of human history run counter to traditional Islamic accounts of human history and purpose. It was Malcolm X's pilgrimage to Mecca and his experience of a "universal brotherhood" in submission to Allah without color lines that helped make permanent his break with Elijah Muhammad and the Nation of Islam in favor of what he regarded as "true Islam." Malcolm X's teachings after his trip to Mecca became a major catalyst for moving many African Americans in the direction of "orthodox" Islam. Elijah Muhammad's own son, Warith Deen Muhammad, was one of these.

After the death of his father, Warith Deen Muhammad took over the Nation and formally brought the organization into mainstream Islamic belief and practice. He rejected the preaching of racial hatred, including the "white man as devil" idea. He instituted the use of traditional Islamic rituals, and he repudiated teachings that identified Elijah Muhammad as a prophet. The organization went through a number of name changes. It had been the Lost-Found Nation of Islam in the Wilderness of North America, then the Nation of Islam. It then became the American Bilalian Community, then the World Community of Islam in the West, and, finally, the American Muslim Mission. In 1985, Warith Deen Muhammad decentralized the organization, delegating the central responsibilities to local imams. He encouraged the merging of African-American Muslims into the worldwide Islamic community. These directives were not accepted by all members of the Nation. Louis Farrakhan is the best-known current spokesman for Elijah Muhammad's teachings, maintaining both the name, the Nation of Islam, and the centralized form of the organization. Farrakhan tends to draw more media attention than the American Muslim Mission, confirming the conviction of many Muslims, African American and immigrants alike, that normative Islam is rarely depicted in the U.S. media.

In reality, there are hints of an increased public awareness of African-American Muslim activity beyond Farrakhan's "Nation." There is increased reportage on mosques being built in American cities. Furthermore, the American Muslim Mission's nationwide system of schools, the Clara Muhammad Schools, has received media attention for the positive contribution to the quality of life and education they are providing in the larger urban areas where they are situated as alternatives to the public schools. There are over sixty of these academically certified schools. Also of significance in the development of American Islamic communities is the fact that these schools are drawing children of recent immigrants into already established African-American communities, thereby fostering a sense of community across ethnic lines. The teachers tend to be immigrants themselves, often with advanced degrees in their native countries. Islamic studies are interwoven with subjects such as English, history, and science, and Arabic is taught from kinder-garten. They espouse a philosophy that is racially inclusive and religiously tolerant. (28) The Clara Muhammad Schools are an example of the growing ties emerging between indigenous and immigrant Muslims. As mentioned, tension does occur when new immigrants attempt to make changes in already established mosque communities, whether they are predominantly African American or immigrant, and this friction has become somewhat heightened in the present climate of growing emphasis on cultural self-affirmation of minority groups in America (mirroring the worldwide self-affirmation of ethnic identity). However, the larger pattern that seems to be emerging is one of increased cooperation, interaction, and even intermarriage between indigenous and immigrant Muslims. Another important segment of the African-American Muslim population that must be mentioned in any consideration of current developments in America is the unprecedented numbers of African Americans who are converting to Islam while in prison. For these (mostly) men, Islam is an important means of identity formation. Many mosques, including Sufi communities, are involved in ministry to prisons, forging community support systems for these prisoners. Furthermore, Muslims in prison are raising important legal questions with regard to freedom of expression of religion for "non-conventional faiths" within prison walls. Issues of whether Muslim prisoners should be entitled to consideration in terms of space and time for worship, dietary restrictions, and wearing beards are being argued in the courts presently. Certain accommodations in the area of religious expression are already permitted in the case of Christian and Jewish prisoners. (29)

The Islamic community in America includes the many mosque communities which are attempting to find ways to accommodate both traditional religious norms and changing constituencies within the cultural context of American society. It includes Muslim "conservatives" and "traditionalists," whose ideologies put them at odds with American secular values, and Muslim "modernists" who wish to be transmitters of Islamic values while working within the framework of the American democratic tradition. The Islamic community includes individual Muslim women and men in every American mosque community who are struggling with the tension between traditional practices and modern secular Western views about the rights and role of women. American Muslims include African-American groups who have chosen to be integrated in the larger Islamic community, but who seek affirmation and respect for their African-American cultural identity. There are those African-American and immigrant Muslim communities that are combining their resources to improve the conditions of recent immigrants and the marginalized poor of the inner cities. Finally, it is evident that the distinction between immigrant and indigenous Islam is rapidly becoming meaningless as "foreign-born" Muslims and their American-born children share mosque community life with growing numbers of American-born Muslims and their children. The Islamic community in America is becoming the major melting pot of the wide variety of racial and ethnic groups that constitute the "traditional" Islamic world. Islam has long been regarded by Westerners as the religion of "the other." Clearly, this perception of Islam will undergo revision in America as Muslim communities grow, and as America comes to re-define itself in terms of its increasingly multicultural and multireligious nature.

This article originally appeared as Chapter 21 of America's Alternative Religions Edited by Timothy Miller Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995

Notes

1. "Mosque," the Muslim "house of prayer" is derived from the Arabic masjid, "place of prostration.'

2. Terms such as "indigenous" and "immigrant" are categories of differentiation that are currently under scrutiny as they become less helpful in describing sociological changes that have taken place in Muslim communities. "Immigrant' communities are becoming "establishment," children are growing and intermarrying, foreign-born Muslims are becoming American citizens, demarcation between the "older" immigrants and the new African and Asian immigrants taking on racist overtones. However, until there is a consensus in the scholarly community on this issue, these terms will be used.

3. The term "orthodoxy" is understood to mean the beliefs and practices that became normative in the community. However, in Islam there is no official body or council that defines "orthodoxy."

4. "Allah" is simply the Arabic word referring to "God." Christians whose native language is Arabic also speak of God as "Allah."

5. As John Esposito points out in Islam: The Straight Path (New York: Oxford Press, 1991), there are a number of variations of "fundamentalist"-or "back to the fundamentals"-movements in the Islamic world, from "moderate" voices who seek reconciliation of traditional Islam and certain aspects of the modern West, to "radical" voices who see the West as a major enemy of Islam with no reconciliation possible, and who condone the use of violence to bring about an Islamic society. See chapter 5.

6. See Esposito, Islam: The Straight Path, chapters 5 and 6.

7. See Fatima Mernissi, The Veil and the Male Elite (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., 1991) and Leila Ahmed, Women and Gender in Islam (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992).

8. "Twelver Shi'ism" is the largest of the Shi'ite groups; other sects include the Ismailis (the "Seveners") and the Druze. See Annemarie Schimmel, "The Shia and Related Sects," in Islam: An Introduction (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1992).

9. Fredrick Denny, An Introduction to Islam (New York: Macmillan Publishing, Co., 1985), 135-36.

10.Yvonne Haddad and Adair T. Lummis, Islamic Values in the United States (New York: Oxford Press, 1987), 3ff.

11. Ibid.

12. Ibid. Among the immigrants were a number of Palestinians who went to Puerto Rico. It is estimated that there are ten thousand Muslims in San Juan alone.

13. Ibid.

14. Ibid., 14.

15. John Voll, "Islamic Issues for Muslims in the United States," in The Muslims of America, ed. Yvonne Haddad (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 205 ff.

16. Frederick Denny, "Emerging Forms of the Muslim Community' (paper delivered at the American Council for the Study of Islamic Societies Annual Meeting, 1992).

17. Frederick Denny, Islam (San Francisco Harper and Row, Publishers, 1987), 111 ff.

18. At the time of this writing, the February 1993 bombing of the World Trade center had just occurred.

19. Frederick Denny, "Emerging Forms of Muslim Community" (paper delivered at the American Council for the Study of Islamic Societies Annual Meeting, 1992).

20. Gutbi Mahdi Ahmed, "Muslim Organizations in the United States," in The Muslims ofamerica, 12.

21. Ibid., 14.

22. Ibid., 15-16.

23. Steven A. Johnson, "Political Activity in Muslims in America,' in The Muslims of America, 112. These are very ideologically oriented Islamic revivalist groups with roots in Egypt and Pakistan, but they have to a great extent become "mainstream" in these countries, renouncing violence as they seek their goal of creating a modern "Islamic" society. There are a small but clearly significant number of Islamic "extremist" groups who affirm the use of violence as a means of fighting "the satanic West." In light of the bombing of the World Trade Center, investigations are underway to locate possible formal connections between American Muslim individuals or groups with these most extremist of "Islamic" groups.

24. Ibid., 113.

25. Ibid., 114-19.

26. See Abubaker al-Shingiety, "The Muslim as the 'Other': Representation and Self Image of the Muslims in America" in The Muslims of America.

27. See Prince-a-Cuba, "Black Gods of the Inner City," Gnosis Magazine, no. 25, (Fall 1992): 56-63.

28. Ari Goldman, "Reading, Writing, Arithmetic, and Arabic," New York Times, 3 October 1992.

29. Kathleen Moore, "Muslims in Prisons: Claims to Constitutional Protection of Religious Liberty" in The Muslims of America, 150-51.

Suggestions for Further Reading

Denny, Frederick. An Introduction to Islam. New York Macmillan Publishing Co., 1985.

------. Islam. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1987.

Haddad, Yvonne, ed. The Muslims of America. New York: Oxford University Press, 1991.

Haddad, Yvonne, and Adair T. Lummis. Islamic Values in the United States. New York: Oxford Press, 1987.

Haddad, Yvonne, and Jane Smith, eds. Muslim Communities in North America. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1994.

Prince-A-Cuba. "Black Gods of the Inner City.' Gnosis Magazine, no. 25 (Fall 1992): 56-63.

Civil Society Political Islam & Shariah Law

This is a thoughtful guest contribution for publication here at the Pak Tea House. We may not agree with all the arguments presented but this could be an excellent vehicle for engendering debate on these issues. (Ed. Raza Rumi)
Bradistan Calling is a proud Pakistani in Bradford, West Yorkshire (Little Pakistan).
Background:
In order to understand the development of Islamic theocracy in Pakistan, we have to understand the different political forces present in pre partition North West India. It is prudent to restrict the analysis to right wing Muslim parties as, regardless of their stance on independent Pakistan; in post partition political spectrum ring wing became the mainstream. The left wing parties (nationalist and communists alike) were pushed to margins either banned from elections or went into collective involuntary underground to escape persecution and torture of their cadre by American backed civil and military dictatorships of the elite.
Pakistani left wing consisted of Muslim cadre of communist party of India, red shirt pushtun of afghan and Pakistani tribal North West frontier headed by “frontier Gandhi” Ghaffar khan a close ally of MK Gandhi of India.
Muslim right wing had three distinct groups:
Unionists: this was a lose grouping of Muslim feudal elite loyal to British crown.Post partition unionists amalgamated with Muslim league. Smaller grouping of Shia, ismaili and ahmediya Muslims from princely states of north India were associated with ML but in later decades they formed their separate religious entities.
Muslim league: a party formed in 1906 by Muslim nobility to counter the Hindu influence of Indian national congress of Gandhi. ML changed its stance from loyalist to separate homeland for Muslims in North West of India in1940s. ML was headed by MA Jinnah a British educated and whisky drinking secular ismaili Muslim barrister, although its worth pointing out that Jinnah was the defense counsel for a Punjabi Muslim fanatic ailmuddin who killed the Hindu publisher rajpal for publishing the biography of prophet Muhammad probably Jinnah wanted to use the sentiments of common Muslims for his religion-political cause of Muslim separatism in British India.
Nationalist Islamists:
These parties were different in their character from Muslim nationalist leaders in congress who advocated for a secular united India. Jamal Islami (JI) and Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI) were and still are the biggest Islamist parties in Pakistan. Pre partition they advocated pan Islamic caliphate of all countries under colonial rule. Labeling Pakistan as kafiristan and Jinnah kafir azam (great infidel). Post independence they captured the main ideological ground in the name of defending Islamic identity and statehood of country of pure (Pakistan in Persian language). Abu Ala Mududi the head of Jamat Islami was a theologian and ideologue not just for Indian Muslims but had strong influence and links with Egyptian Muslim brotherhood and salafi whaabi dynasty of al-Saud in Arabia, which helped jihad financially and in manpower in later history of Pakistan and Afghanistan. JUI had and still runs the biggest network of madrasah seminaries for Taliban (student in Arabic) in Pakistan .the main patrons of JUI were Saudi Arabia Libya and Iraq.
The history of shariah  in Pakistan
1947 the independence of India was stained with blood and rape of millions of refugees trying to reach Muslim Pakistan or Hindu India. Gangs of Muslim and Hindu and Sikh fanatics killed and raped their own neighbours.
1948 saw the outbreak of Kashmir war, when Jinnah frustrated by non obedience of English officers order the fanatical pushtun tribesmen from Waziristan and Khyber to take Kashmir in the name of Islam, sadly Jinnah died of T.B without completing the Jihad. 1949 Pakistan legislative assembly amended the 1935 interim constitution to include Koran and Sunnah of prophet as the supreme law.
1951 saw the killing of the first prime minister in Rawalpindi at the hands of one of the tribesmen. Military officers, newspaper editors, communist leaders and frontier Gandhi were imprisoned and charged with treason, in order to curtail the politics of leftwing. Martial law was imposed in city of Lahore after the torture of followers of ahmadiyya (who believed in 19th century prophet Mahdi Messiah).
1950s was a period of disenfranchising the majority province of east Bengal where leftwing Hindu middleclass was 15% of the population and a Muslim cleric mullah bashahni was the head of political alliance of communists and Maoist peasants. The ruling elite was afraid of the majority. The martial law of Sandhurst educated dictator field marshal Ayub khan (the poster boy for American administrations in cold war era) banned independent newspapers and put left leaning politicians in jail and many communist sympathisers like hasan nasir were killed in torture cells of Lahore fort while the Islamists were free to preach and practice whatever they wanted.
Under pressure from Kennedy/Johnson administrations ayub khan introduced reforms in family laws of Muslim personal code, making it necessary for husband to seek written permission for a second marriage from the first wife. Women could sue for divorce and family inheritance in civil courts. Family planning was allowed. US aid was used to open girl’s schools in rural areas. All this infuriated the clergy.
The proverbial last nail in the coffin was the presidential election of 1965, local government councilors were supposed to vote for president ayub khan without any serious challenge. The left and the secular parties in East and West Pakistan nominated Fatima Jinnah, a spinster elderly sister of late Jinnah, as a consensus compromise candidate because she had popular support. The mullahs declared woman candidate for presidency un-Islamic.
In referendums involving sitting military dictators, like Zia ulhaq in 1984 or musharaf in 2002 and 2007, vote rigging and horse-trading of the turncoat members are used to turn a unfavourable electorate into a best possible result. There was a massive protest but, like 1984 siachen and 1999 kargil operations, military started a misadventure in Kashmir to divert the attention.
September 1965 war left economy in total collapse and military in ruin. American help was at hand, but economic aid, much like the 1980s afghan jihad and 9/11 war on terror package, was directed at the industrial and feudal families rather then the poor. The Poor got “low grade” Mexican Corn (Folklore still remembers as “too hard to chew”), and donkey(a symbol of stupidity) carts with American flags in their necks.  These  dictators (Ayub, Zia and Musharaf) and their cronies are scornfully known in street lexicon as “Ali Baba and forty thieves”. Every major crisis since then (be that burning of Al Aqsa mosque, siege of Mecca by militants or satanic verses and Danish Cartoons, and 2008 releasing soon Dutch films on Islam and American novel on child bride of Muhammad) mobs charged with religious zeal always burn symbols of America (American Cultural Centres, Citi Bank, KFCs and McDonalds) in Pakistan. 1960s was a time of war in Vietnam, Socialist marches in European capitals while in American the civil rights movement was making big strides under the leadership of martin Luther king. Students, felt that they can take on the Mullahs and the Military,
brought the country to a standstill.
The Great  Game:
Politicians were divided on geographic/ethnic lines. Punjabis were led by  charismatic Sindhi feudal zulfikar Ali Bhutto, educated in Eton oxford and Berkeley. Bhutto had invented the slogans of Islamic socialism and food shelter and clothing for all citizens. In Bengal  mujeeb rehman an ex socialist was leading a campaign of autonomy from the feudal/bureaucratic structures of Pakistan. Parting shot of dictators is usually an autobiography (”friends, not masters” by Ayub, “In the line of fire” by musharaf, sadly Zia exploded before/due to “a case of exploding mangoes” ghost written by Muhammad Hanif 2008) lamenting the abortion of their “true” legacy for greater Pakistan. Election resulted in majority Bengali parliament. The Punjabi army killed and raped thousands in Bengal. In December 1971 India invaded to strike a humiliating defeat and Bangladesh declared independence. Bhutto became the leader of remaining Pakistan.
1970s saw the nationalization of industries and piece meal reforms. In 1973 Bhutto gave Pakistan its first consensus democratic constitution. compromises made with feudals and Islamists in cities (among small traders and armed student wing JI)forcibly marginalised  the silent majority.
Islamisation measures initiated by Bhutto (secular, whisky loving, and playboy) were supported by Saudi Arabian king Faisal’s generous visa policy for Pakistani labourers and military personnel who wanted to earn quick petro-dollars. Friday was declared weekly holiday, Sale/purchase of alcohol was banned to Muslims and restricted to Christian and Hindus via government permit only.Hotels with casinos clubs and discotheques were shut down.
The Law that declared ahmadiyya (sect of muslim messiah) as non Muslims. shifted the society from socialist reforms to demand for shariah. An agitation fueled by CIA dollars and Islamist manpower destabilised Bhutto . American administration was unhappy at the deal for French nuclear reprocessing plant and feared  Bhutto was making “Islamic bomb” to avenge the humiliation by India.The martial law of 1977 was a copycat of the 1973 Chilean coup by General Augusto Pinochet at the behest of USA. Bhutto was hanged in 1979 by the Islamist military dictator Zia ul haq after a show trial which was termed as judicial murder (”If I am assassinated” by ZA Bhutto 1979)
Islamist General Zia unleashed state terror on politics. Hundreds of thousands of political activists, lawyers’ students’ leaders were imprisoned. Thousands were given Islamic punishment of flogging or hanged at the orders of military courts.1979 invasion of Afghanistan by soviet troops made Zia the most trusted ally of USA, Britain and Saudi Arabia. Billions of dollars in foreign exchange, latest military equipment and thousands of young fighters from Arab countries poured into Pakistan to fight the jihad against the evil soviet atheists.
The shariah began with the law of evidence where the testimony of two pious Muslim women was only considered equal to one male, thus declaring a woman only half a human in all matter of law. Hadood laws prescribed the Islamic justice of public flogging for consumption of Alcohol, cutting hands for robbery and most draconian of all was the stoning to death for adultery, even a victim of rape had to provide testimony of four pious male Muslim witnesses in order to prove her innocence. The case of a blind girl charged for adultery, who gave birth to “her sin” child while the rapist got Scot free due to lack of four male pious Muslim witnesses, got international publicity.
Muslims who did not pray during office hours or did not fast and anyone caught eating during the fasting of Ramadan faced prosecution. Zakat was compulsorily deducted from Muslim account holders in all banks, this created the biggest Shia demonstration Pakistan has ever seen. Shia sect refused to comply with shariah being imposed by general Zia and his Saudi mentors. Shias(20% in population) contemplated starting a civil disobedience, backing down after pressure from Shia clergy of Iranian revolution. Zia fearing a belligerent Iran and hostility from educated shias within military and civil bureaucracy exempted Shia from zakat deduction.
Iran created the shia militants (movement for enforcing the laws of imam jaffar), Saudi Arabia and Iraq responded by arming the “soldiers of companions of Mohammed”, an organisation openly calling shia as non Muslims and  declaration of Sunni law in line with Saudi clergy.
While the sectarian killings continued by the two sides, Zia turned his attention to minorities (Ahmedis, Christians,Hindus) and forced them to declare their faith on identity documents and separate election system was devised for them(a bit like apartheid). Ahmedis were banned from preaching or observe Islamic rituals of sermon prayers, fasting or even greeting each other by Muslim salutation. They were ordered to remove all Muslim signage from their mosques. Anyone who did not comply with these rules suffered prison, fines and public flogging. The Ahmedi caliph and his clergy fled to London to save their lives, while militant groups turned their guns toward common ahmedi and christian who were living intermingled with rural Punjabi peasants.
The blasphemy laws with punishment of death sentence for anyone accused of belittling or ridiculing prophet Muhammad by their speech or action and anyone found to be disrespectful to Koran by improper question/speaking or disposing of papers containing Koranic verses. Police complaint by local clergy was needed as proof of guilt. Blasphemy law was used indiscriminately against ahmedis and Christians in Punjab and against Hindus and Sikhs in Sindh and frontiers to settle petty property disputes, in which the accuser walked away with war booty and the non Muslim victim stood to loose everything. Even obtaining a bail from court sometimes meant being gunned down by militants within few meters of police stations.
Individuals stood up against tyranny by committing suicide in public protest Pervaiz messiah a lowly Christian cleaner burnt himself alive while demanding democracy. Bishop John Joseph Shot himself in protest against death sentences awarded to Christian teenagers in blasphemy cases.
Lawyers, journalists, teachers and others who came out protesting against oppression, faced tear gas beatings and imprisonment and torture at the hands of police and army security forces. Civil society organizations like women action forum, Human rights commission, voice against rape and Pakistan India peoples forum for peace and democracy emerged out of the dark days of Islamic dictatorship backed shamelessly by Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan.
Benazir, the daughter of martyr Bhutto, came back after years in jail and exile to lead several million men marches against dictatorship. In April 88 Pakistani intelligence blew up the ammunition depot storing missiles, explosives and state of the art stinger launchers, to hide the illegal sale to Iran and other bidders and to stop US military audit finding out the full extend of scam. The resulting inferno and projectiles killed nearly three thousand civilians in cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad.  August 88 Zia’s aero plane was blown up in mysterious circumstances. Rumours circulated that Zia’s  Coffin contained bones of American Arnold Raphael and Brigadier Wassem  of US Army.
Benazir became the first female Muslim prime minister in the world despite Saudi grand mufti Shaikh Al Baz declaring her apostate from Islam.1990s was the see saw of power politics between right wing Nawaz Sharif(political heir to Saudis and Zia) and  a compromised corrupt Benazir wife of Zardari(Mr 10%) .The notorious military Intelligence was busy creating the Frankenstein monsters we now know as Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda. Pre 9/11 Bin Laden gave money to Sharif MPs to oust Benazir and tried General Abbasi’s Islamic coup plot to establish caliphate in Pakistan. But the proto type of Global Islamism was perfected in Afghanistan with Arab manpower, money from arms and drug trade and clandestine connections in Muslim populations world over with mafia like tentacles. The rest, as they say, is history. Kashmir, Chechnya, Palestine and 9/11 New York, Iraq and London Madrid and Bali the template of terrorism was implemented by  Jihadists.
Political Islam’s Globalisation
Tragically, Benazir (Book “Daughter of the East” 2007) died at the hands of a suicide bomber at the same spot where in 1951 the first prime minister was gunned down. Story of political Islam has completed the full circle with history repeating itself. The gains made by civil society in the struggle for democracy and freedom of judiciary ,achieved by street protest and activism are compromised in deal making and power brokering. Saudi Arabia, UAE and USA remain the guarantors and underwriters of power whether its the corrupt current president Mr 10% Zardari or the future (president in waiting) Mr Sharif of Mecca simpleton (sorry cannot write autobiography only reads phone directories) Tableeghi (Muslim Jehovah’s witness). A foreign journalist once said Pakistan Owes its existence to Allah, America and Army. The Army “greatest defender of Muslim faith and Islamic Atom bomb”, behaves like the band of mercenaries from “pirates of Arabian Sea”, switching sides from Islamists to Bible bashing American fundamentalists whenever the pay is right. At other times paddling their nuclear ware to rogue states like Iran Libya and North Korea.
For Jihad ,”The World is Flat”
All this is important because the disintegration of Pakistan will unleash the forces of evil, ranging from nuclear brief cases to training manuals and kits for “dirty bombs”. The civil society, the free media and satellite channels, human rights activist and professional middle class, is overwhelmed by the onslaught of Islamists which can result in balkanisation of Pakistan.UK can do well by strengthening the civil society and secular political parties because one million of British citizens/residents are of Pakistani origin coming from Kashmir and north west of Pakistan.7/7 suicide bomber mastermind Mohammed siddique khan prayed at Tableeghi(Mr Nawaz sharif ’s mentors) Jamat’s  HQ in Dewsbury. Thomas Friedman’s Theory “The World is Flat”, I hasten to add “World is a small place”, “what you sow, so shall you reap”.

In Peace the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons

img_3441BY FRANK HUZUR
There never was a good war or a bad peace! In peace the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons.
Humphrey Hawksley was the face and voice of BBC television and radio broadcasts in Asia from 1986 to 1997. It was Hawksley who was chosen to open the BBC’s first television bureau in China in 1994. Indian and Pakistani public, not the least movers and shakers in corridor of power, had a strange tryst with this BBC correspondent in summer of 2001, a couple of years after both arch-rivals had beaten their chests with nuclear-heathen missiles and came dangerously close to bite the Uranium dust in Kargil heights. Hawksley launched his prophetic fiction work, Dragon Fire, with much fanfare and pomposity, predicting nuclear nightmare between New Delhi and Islamabad towards the end of this very decade. Precisely, Hawksley fiction predicts the starts of nuclear war in May of 2007 when Pakistan’s atomic strike leads India to devastating retribution. Suddenly, China, India and Pakistan are at war, and the nuclear arsenals are being mobilized. Humphrey predicted China pushes the world ever closer to Armageddon with her bombing of Indian. The US and UK threaten to retaliate against China, though Moscow warns that she will attack Europe or America should such an action occur.
This frightening prophecy of Humphrey Hawksley didn’t bring tears to eyes of Indians or Pakistanis or for that matter Chinese in the May of 2007. It’s a passé now as a gaffe. In summer of 2001, the then Defence Minister in the Hindu Nationalist BJP-led NDA government, George Fernandes had, however, exhorted every Indian and Pakistani to read Hawksley’s labour of love between the lines. If not anything, Fernandes had gleefully prescribed the copy of ‘Dragon Fire like a doctor in all-white showing off a plastic vial of Johnson’s baby shampoo. This formula was gentle to eyes, he had smirked, saying, it cleanses the scalp of our imagination without stinging the eyes. Nuclear bomb seemed then to motor-mouth defence minister just like shampoo, which should be only for external use and must be kept out of reach of children and its use must be discontinued if skin irritation occurs.
There is not a great gulf between May of 2007 and November-December of 2008. A quick rifling of finger calculation tells us only 18 months have passed away before mind-numbing terror strikes on Mumbai, 26/11, have punctured the balloon of peace and elevated the slumbering hostilities between New Delhi and Islamabad to menacing level. Hawksley paints a make-believe portrait of nuclear war where he would have us believe the Indian Interior Minister is a Bengali-speaking hardliner and commander of a sector in Kashmir has his surname Chidrambaram, while the Prime Minister is a Brahmin, symbolizing the power hierarchy of pre-dominant Hindu India. Not much seem to be different in India of 2008-2009 where the diminutive dynamo Pranab Mukherjee, a Bengali-speaking firebrand Congress leader though the External Affairs Minister of rising, resurgent India has been pushed into the ring to lead the pack of ‘hunting hawks’ against gaggle of novice democrats in Islamabad. The gentleman by the last name of Chidambaram is the sudden boss of Interior Ministry, scrambling his financial wizardry to plug in the loopholes of vast intelligence apparatus. Throwing the Hawksley prophecy on its head, Indian Prime Minister is not the one of a Brahmin descent, though his predecessor Atal Behari Vajpayee indeed was! Prime Minister Manmohan Singh is a Sikh, not elected directly by Indian electorate to the lower House of Parliament, rather thrust into the hot seat by will of destiny and desire of Sonia Gandhi’s sacrifice for the highest office of land of over One billion people, and he is a silent spectator to the war of shooting arrows-like-war-rhetoric. But as he prepares to commander the Indian attack against Pakistan, he is very much conversant with the reality of authorizing a war against the land where he was once born. Dr Manmohan Sing was born in Gah, now in Chakwal district of Punjab in Pakistan. If India goes to war against Pakistan in coming weeks, some missiles might stray into the birthplace of Indian Prime Minister, and this will sum up the dark irony of waging war. During times of war, hatred becomes quite respectable, even though it has to masquerade often under the guise of patriotism.
In India of 2008, Sonia Gandhi-Manmohan Singh led-UPA government would be the most unwilling of duo to strike on an Islamic Republic. Through out its four-and-half-year rule, the Congress-led government has been accused by its principal claimant to power, BJP, of appeasing Muslims, the 150-million strong minorities in Secular-democratic republic of India. The Congress has ruled India by the overpowering support of a huge chunk of Muslim voting en masse for it. All these four years, Manmohan Singh and his financial managers had been painting a picture of a perfect world where all the communities, including Muslims, Dalits, backward Hindus and tiny Christians had been aspiring to development, so they must not go to war. However, like Hawksley says in prologue of his prophetic literature, Dragon Fire, Time and time again common sense is turned on its head and even societies whose standards of living are rising rapidly use the excitement of nationalism to balance either the treadmill of economic growth or the weakness of corrupt leadership. Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan and swathes of Africa at once come to mind and danger signals are now flashing in Pakistan, India and muted China.
However, there is a strange paradox in the theory. Hawksley had not anticipated monstrous events like 9/11 before offering his cup of nuclear café. He hadn’t conceived the hot-bubble bath of NATO-American-British forces on the borders of Pakistan-Afghanistan, nor had he predicted at the time the sprouting of blood-pool in razing of glittering five-star properties of Taj, Trident and Marriot. He had not imagined the dance of dangerous dragons like non-state actors, as Pakistan President and widower of Benazir Bhutto would want Indian leadership to believe.
The Congress government in New Delhi doesn’t want to sacrifice some more of its soldiers. It has to run for cover for losing over a dozen of its elite security force-National Security Guard commandos in ‘Operation Thunderstorm’ at hotel Taj Mahal and Trident on 26-29 November 2008. Like Herman Goering once told Adolf Hitler, naturally the common people don’t want war, neither in India, nor in Pakistan, nor in American, nor in Germany or England. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.
Pranab Mukherjee talking ‘hawk-hunting’ diplomatese knows if he doesn’t attack with his tongues and if he blinks in demonstrating patriotism, the BJP hawks would expose his party to danger and hijack the April-May 2009 Parliamentary elections. Nobody sells hate-Pakistan agenda in Indian cities and villages more successfully than the BJP. And here lies the rub! Mumbai attacks was an attack on ‘Shining, rising India’. It was an attack on corporate India, who has been inured to living in a perfect world. Its representative fills the coffers of the political parties and its members who jockeys for power and take turns each five year. It must swing into action or it stand to lose everything. It is no ordinary situation. The ambition and impatience of media houses are also on the boil, for their members who dine at exclusive, glittering preserves of five-star restaurants have also been shot into their chest and head and gone silent for good.
I was in Lahore on 13 September 2008. This was my fifth visit to cultural capital of Pakistan and hometown of nation’s most recognisable son, Imran Khan. I had arrived in the evening of September 8 on my last leg of Imran Khan tour in course of completing my biography of Imran Khan, the politician and chairman of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf. Just as the evening dust settled in the clear sky of Lahore, all the 40 news channels of Pakistan were beaming live pictures of serial blasts ripping into heart of New Delhi. There was fear on the brain. I didn’t waste any moment in tuning into the Geo TV broadcast at my guesthouse in Gulberg. All the calls to New Delhi were jammed, anxiety deep within me was acquiring cancerous colour with passage of every minute. Because I was worried about the well being of my actor-companion who happened to be in Mandi House-nerve-centre of drama and theatre- rehearsing for her stage drama, Laila Majnu. As the clock on the wall struck eight , I finally hear her panicking voice, assuring me of her escape, unscathed in the brutal serial blast where one of her theatre actor friends had received minor bruises in the explosions at Underground Metro station of Barakhmba road. Then, I spoke to my Indian publisher who was in the Cannaught Place-Rajiv Chowk, stuck in panic and fear as the police cordon off the area, and begin viewing every passing soul with lingering eyes of suspicion.
It was Saturday on 13th of September. In the evening, Imran Khan’s brother-in-law hosted me for dinner at Kababish, a hot spot for kabab hunters in heart of Lahore. He broke into swear words against the terrorists who are hitting city after city in India and then drew parallel with a series of blasts in Lahore itself over the past year, not to mention multiple blasts rocking one town or the other in North West Frontier Province and North and south Waziristan.
Hafeezullah Khan Niazi was grieving with me, and so were dozen of my acquaintances in Lahore and Islambad who were calling me up to commiserate with the ghastly tragedy in New Delhi. Imran Khan was in Islambad on 13 September 2008. He was returning to Lahore the very next morning. He was the first politician of Pakistan to condemn the series of lethal blasts in New Delhi. His party, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf beat even the Prime Minister and President’s office in issuing statements of condolence and shock and horror.
A week later, I was still in Lahore on 20 September 2008. I was to leave for Islambad in the early hours of next morning.
In the evening of September 20, the news of lethal explosion with the help of 1400 kilogram of RDX driven by a lone suicide bomber into lobby of Marriot Hotel, one of the two five star hotels in federal capital territory of Islambad, reached Lahore with the speed of a hurricane. I was once again in my guest room, fiddling with half-baked manuscript of Imran Khan biography, Imran versus Imran-An Untold Story.
The entire swanky hotel was charred to charcoal black holes, portico wad buried under the over 30 feet crater dug in flash by the impact of the blast. Fear gripped me before news of casualty of over 60 people, including Czech ambassador and two US Marines sunk into my mind.
My fear had its root in my nationality. I was an Indian in Pakistan at the time the country was mourning the first ever deadliest blast at a five-star hotel. Quite a great number of news channels got cracking over the hidden hands behind the blasts. Nearly every anchorperson or analysts of repute spoke about foreign hands behind the tragedy. Nonetheless, all of them refrained and restrained themselves from naming the foreign hand. My fear storming out of my nationality subsided by the early morning when my Lahore-based friend, Nisar Ahmed Chaudhary who works for peace between India and Pakistan and heads Pakistan chapter of South Asian Fraternity arrived to drive me on  motorway to Islamabad.
The night of 20th September was full of fearful sleeplessness. Ahsan Rashid, head of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf Punjab chapter hosted me for dinner the very evening and dropped me at the guesthouse. He assuaged my fear and spoke about the terrorist helplessness to target American Marines and other Western guests who are like housemates at Marriot any time in the year. Sleep eluded me throughout the eerie night, as I couldn’t take my eyes off live broadcast on news channels. Imran had left for Brussels to address the European Parliament in the same afternoon. I was to return to New Delhi a couple of days later.
I found myself grieving with my Pakistani friends just as they were grieving with me in the night of New Delhi serial blasts a week ago. Islambad was a ghost city in the afternoon of 21 September. My escort will hesitate to drive down the blue area where ghostly, razed Marriot stood like a beheaded bride. I wanted to pay a brief visit to Press Trust of India, Islambad correspondent Rezaul Hasan Laskar who was waiting on me. Nisar would fear to drive down an Indian residence in Islambad for fear of being nabbed by Pakistan Inter-Services Intelligence officials patrolling the street in plain clothes. I still persisted and forced him to take me to PTI correspondent friend. When we reach the place, there was no trace of any intelligence officials manning the street. It was a surprise as much for me as for my Pakistani friend.
The Marriot blast completed the half-century of bomb blasts of varying intensity in one single year in Pakistan. Before the ghost of Marriot returned to haunt Taj Mahal, Trident and CST station in heart of India commercial capital, Mumbai, we in India also have had our tryst with as many bomb blasts of different intensity in different Indian cities. Over 2500 Pakistani, including some prosperous and vast crowd of poor had perished in the blasts from Bejaur in Waziristan to Karachi in Sindh. We in India didn’t have lesser number of dead and maimed. Until Delhi blasts, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh didn’t raise his finger at Pakistan, nor did President Asif Ali Zardari jumped the gun to pass the buck to Indian spy agencies in fuelling the catastrophic blasts.
Everything changed in the dark, silent night of 26 November. As media reports would have us believe, the terrorists colleague of Azmal Qasab who is now in custody were looking frantically for people with the American and British passports. At Nariman House, they demonstrated their mission statement in gunning down six Israelis, including the Rabbi. In all, their target were not only Indian citizens, not only Hindu Indians, they were instructed to kill Americans, British, Jews and Muslims. They accomplished their mission to their utmost satisfaction before succumbing to elite security force National Security Guard bullets. Nearly one fourth of total victims who felled to assassins’ bullet were Indian Muslims.
Indian government reacted sharply to the scale of the tragedy, which shook the foundation of Indian state in course of over 50 hours shoot-out at shining India’s finest landmark, Hotel Taj. The arrest of Azmal Qasab buttressed the New Delhi case, as the Versace-wearing assassin started singing like canary and actually became the global face of Mumbai massacre. The Congress-led UPA government acted with purpose of intent, though a tad nervous in face of Assembly elections still unfinished in state of Rajasthan and Delhi. With news channels breaking into ‘war-cry’ against Pakistan, and people on streets of Mumbai swearing expletives against politicians of all spectrums for failing to protect precious lives, not much was left on the platter of the UPA Government though.
The need of the hour was to talk tough with Islambad, as increasing evidence of involvement of Laskhar-e-Tayyba with implicit support of some rogue, retired elements of Pakistan dreaded Inter-Services Intelligence began to surface, as so has been alleged by the Indian Intelligence agencies and investigators.
Indian offensive diplomacy has indeed brought consolation prize to South Block bosses in New Delhi. The ban on Jamat-ul-Dawa, alleged charity front for Laskhar-e-Tayba in the United Nations Security Council has been a calming influence on jangled nerves of Indian leadership. Hawks on the street are heaving a sigh of relief over the clinching of first major breakthrough. Its implication has put Zardari administration in deep trouble in Pakistan. Three weeks after the tragedy, Indian Defence Minister A K Antony has categorically ruled out military strikes against Pakistan, sending ripples of joy in Pakistani streets, but Indian external affairs minister wouldn’t commit the same just as differing voices are emerging from different shooting mouths in Islamabad.
Whether Indian diplomacy has succeeded in cornering Pakistan or not, it is too early to predict anything. However, the churning of sequence of events at breakneck speed over the days and nights does provide fodder for the thought. In less than three weeks, Manmohan Singh government has, however, achieved one major battle against its principal opposition and main claimant to power, the BJP. The passage of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and the National Investigation Agency Bill on the floor of Parliament with enthusiastic, though, cringing support of the BJP has provided gleeful moments for Congress leaders, who were so perilously on backfoot whenever L K Advani and company raised the issue of scrapping of tough terror law-POTA enacted during the NDA government. Before winning over the BJP, the Congress had pre-empted its victory in Rajasthan and Delhi, defying pollster prediction that the BJP will ride the Mumbai terror wave to sweep these states too, in addition to Chattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh.
The terrorists, recruited and trained by Lashkar-e-Tayyeba, a Jihadist organisation with alleged links with Taliban and Al Qaeda, had an on objective cut out. Their masters had calculated their success and failure graph with compact precision despite knowing the fact that both New Delhi and Islambad had nuclear warheads and they wouldn’t be allowed to go to war unless something really unthinkable takes place. Only 9/11-like scenario could have attracted angry, war-like response from New Delhi towards Pakistan. And, the terrorists were determined to wreak tragedy not less powerful in impact than that of September 11 America experienced in the collapse of twin towers in Manhattan.
The architect of the apocalypse at Taj Mahal Tower would want to succeed. They would want to blow the bridge of peace hitherto quaking, yet quelling, to pieces. It’s not that executioners of attacks on Marriot and Taj don’t know anything like there never was a good war or a bad peace! In peace, the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons. In Indian streets, over fifty bomb blasts across the country in a single year have forced fathers and sons to bury each other. They were all hapless, indigent citizen of India Inc, so their screams ended in whimper. The shining, resurgent Indian state didn’t feel the jolt from the blue to train guns on its neighbour, nor did it feel the urgency to sweep the moth-eaten carpet of its Intelligence apparatus. The death of over fifty thousand Indians in such blasts over a decade didn’t force even 24/7 media maestros to declare war on the evil of terrorism. Their anger and anguish remained confined to studio-debate over Rakhi Sawant and rippling muscle of Khalli, the wrestler who is being mobbed by American teenager planting lollypop scarlet scars of kiss on his puffed-up chests, and Indian idols.
In similar sense of outrage on Pakistani streets, people have swallowed the anger and anguish and buried not only their sons and daughters, but over 1600 soldiers, who have died fighting their own men in the on-going third-war of Waziristan, in search of Osama bin Laden and his cave-warriors.
In such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people, not to be on the side of the executioners. It is time to bury the Aristotlean concept repackaged by shoe-dodger American president George W Bush, ‘we make war that we may live in peace’. Since March 9, 2007 when General Pervez Musharraf sacked the Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary, the world was watching the never-before-seen outpouring of emotion for Independent judiciary on streets of Pakistan. Forget a huge force of 90,000 screaming lawyers, there were hundreds of thousands of Pakistani on streets chanting slogans in support of free judiciary behind pied piper of rule of law like Imran Khan and others. Alas, the world community failed the aspirations of Pakistani for rule of law. America and Britain, as much as New Delhi and Riyadh bypassed the historic opportunity to censure the ‘charade of justice’ on show.
Today, New Delhi is mourning it has no faith in the confidence of incumbent civilian President, and leaders in New Delhi are wrinkling their nose in disgust when leader of Pakistan People’s Party government urge New Delhi to repose faith in its judicial system for trying the arrested suspect in Pakistani court. New Delhi missed the opportunity of condemning the rape of judiciary while it was going on in broad daylight on Pakistani streets. Not even a single bar association in India passed a single resolution for fear of annoying President General Musharraf.
Terrorists wanted to trigger war between India and Pakistan. They are nervous of up-coming Barrack Obama presidency, who has warned hot pursuits against Taleban and Al Qaeda in tribal areas of Pakistan and in Afghanistan. Little wonder, they didn’t make any demands and also they didn’t take any hostages. All hostages were gunned down. They wanted to force India to mobilize its troop against Pakistan on the eastern front, thus forcing Pakistan to retaliate. In doing so, Pakistan was going to be forced to withdraw its 150000 troops fighting terrorists in tribal areas on Afghan border. But their action was also designed to provoke massacre against Indian Muslims at the hands of majority Hindus. This would have brought further dividends to extremist group looking for recruits. They have failed in some, their prospect of gaining in some of their objectives is beginning to look brighter.
Pakistan army has lost over 1500 of its soldiers fighting Taleban and Al Qaeda elements in the tribal agency in the course of four years operation ever since General Pervez Musharraf sent troops to fight in the tribal areas. Withdrawal of troops from western fronts to eastern fronts would have been a win-win situation for Pakistan army too. Pakistan army has been fighting a losing battle in the tribal areas. The history of army suggests it was raised to fight India, not its own people.
Little wonder most of Pakisitani soldiers don’t put up much fight and surrender gleefully to Baitullah Mehsud’s army. India will retaliate and Pakistan military would moved its troops to further perpetuate the saga of half-a-century conflict. By doing so, it is going to win-all-round support from Pakistani citizen, who have turned against it during General Musharraf tenure. This is what America and Britain understand clearly and are trying to nip in the bud. Even though Indian government was under tremendous pressure from its own people, angry and bitter towards Pakistan, Condoleeza Rice and Gordon Brown calmed the nerves of Manmohan Singh government, saying bigger battle is raging on in Pakistan tribal areas and Afghanistan where NATO forces would be at the receiving ends if Pakistan pulls out of alliance. Don’t forget Pakistan has been given status of main non-Nato ally in the war against terrorism by American President George W Bush.
Imran Khan left for London on December 3 while war-mongering was in full swing on streets of India and Pakistan. He was visiting London to address British Parliamentarians in the House of Commons, the lower house of British Parliament. He was regretting the terrible tragedy in Mumbai and was at loss for words over shoot-out at Taj Mahal hotel where has spent many a nights in course of his stay in Mumbai. Imran wants India to show patience and maturity in dealing with the nightmare. “We all in Pakistan are sad and in sorrow over loss of lives. But I expect maturity in response from Prime Minister Manmohan Singh. Terrorists have their own agenda, and both New Delhi and Islambad are suffering at their hands. They don’t want peace between nuclear neighbours, and we can’t afford to fight a nuclear war. We have to fight this common enemy. Until the investigation is over, it is immature on behalf of New Delhi to blame Pakistan for the atrocities”.
However, Imran was bitter with Indian government decision to throw the proposed tour of Indian cricketers into dustbin of prevailing hatred against Pakistan. He was blunt in blaming the Indian government for poor handling of the entire situation, and for sacrificing healing power of cricket at the alter of power politics.
Imran was invited by President Zardari during the All Party Conference in Islamabad. He had declined all the previous invitation of Pakistan People’s Party government due to its failure to restore the suspended chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhary. Imran says until there is rule of law in Pakistan, terrorists can’t be fought with success. He says, “Islam shouldn’t be blamed for any terrorist acts, anywhere in the world. Taleban and Al Qaeda extremists are illegitimate offspring of a union between the United States under Ronald Reagan and Pakistan under General Zia-ul-Haq. Then, the Washington hailed them as freedom fighters, now it is using unmanned droners, helicopter gunships and missiles to kill innocent civilians in name of hunting down terrorists on Pakistani soil. Pakistan army may be an ally of the US in military action, people of Pakistan have turned against both Pakistan army and the USA. With each missile strikes, American gives birth to a dozen of suicide bombers in the lap of Taleban and Al Qaeda. Indian government should take notice of the crisis and adopt a comprehensive strategy to avert such attacks in future, which is only possible by engaging Islamabad in dialogue and fighting its own indigenous terror outfits, because without ground support from local Indian extremists or terrorists, no outside terror group can carry out such dastardly acts. If any Pakistani citizen is involved in the attacks, Pakistan government must stringent action to prevent such occurrence in future”.
The cloud of war might have scattered for sometime, but it has started gathering over our head. Fighter jets are scrambling in Islamabad and New Delhi. The UPA government is in double-bind. It doesn’t want to blink, and allow Hindu nationalists major share in electoral pie. When the Minorities Affairs Minister, AR Antulay whipped up the cord of investigation into the killing of Anti-Terror Squad chief Hemant Karkare, who had opened the can of worms by exposing Hindu Jehadists hand in Malegaon blasts, and was on the verge of opening a pandora’s box by investigating Samjhuata Express blasts, all hell broke loose. Even neutral observers in Indian media, not the least Hindu zealts, are baying for his blood. The poor minister has only asked after a separate probe into the circumstance of Karkare’s death. He is not claiming that Karkare has not been killed in the brush-fire of terrorists. Though the Congress party appeared like crumbling under united onslaught of Opposition BJP, Antulay has received support from some Congress leaders of tall stature. However, he has won support from Muslim MPs in Indian Parliament from across the party spectrum.
Under the clouds of war, it is humanity which hangs on the cross of iron. New Delhi is punching with iron gloves. The list of 20 handed over to Zardari government was a ploy by India to trap President Ali Zardari. As some sources in Islambad suggest, Prime Minister Manmohan Singh sent feelers through British Prime Minister Gordon Brown to President Zardari that the Indian government will be satisfied with handing over of Jaish-e-Mohammed headman, Maulana Masood Azhar. The Congress wants to score one up over the BJP, which released him in 1999 Christmas celebration. However, this scenario is extremely difficult one.
If Zardari relents and obliges New Delhi, Islamist forces in Pakistan would mount serious challenge to overthrow PPP government. They can create civil war-like situation on streets of Pakistan, forcing Pakistan army to intervene. This is another scenario New Delhi would not want to happen, but electoral calculation doesn’t take upheaval in Pakistan into consideration. Not long ago General Musharraf was a favourite dictator of New Delhi government. Thus, New Delhi can do business with another dictator if it succeed in satisfying angry public back home.
As America and England and other Western nations are succeeding in stopping New Delhi from going all out with military option, New Delhi knows its options are limited. If UPA government fails in the offensive diplomacy to win any election-winning concessions from Pakistan, it will lose ground to the BJP in next year April-May elections. If UPA government doesn’t go to war and the BJP-led NDA returns to power, LK Advani as a Prime Minister is more likely to go to war. It may not launch ground offensive, but air-strike option is not ruled out. New Delhi has modern Russian fighter jet, Mirage. It has the capability, with some losses, to penetrate deep into Pakistani territory. New Delhi has also acquired radar and electronic warfare equipment from Israel and it is also believed to have obtained some early precision-guided munitions from Russia and Israel.
The Obama Administration may not be able to prevail with hawkish BJP government at the centre six months later. One more attacks of similar scale and the spark flew thick and fast, as American president-elect Obama himself admitted India has right to act in the night of November 27. New Delhi has already made it clear that the ISI is their enemy. New Delhi might be tempted to attack key installations in Islambad, likely targeting ISI building, destroying files and personnel in targeted air strikes. And, Pakistan might find retaliation difficult, given the strength of its air force. It may not be the likely option for New Delhi, but the government may be considering this option. If not Manmohan Singh government, surely LK Advani-led government!
If it happens, says Hamid Mir, the immediate casualty will be growth of democracy in Pakistan. “It is in interest of India to support the flourish of democracy in Pakistan. Only a strong democratic government can crush terrorism and extremism from Pakistan soil. General Pervez Musharraf ruled Pakistan for nine years, but his tenure only helped the rise of extremists. New Delhi should cooperate with Zardari government as it is the tragedy of both governments”.
In the end, I can only recall ‘God of Guitar’ Jimmy Hendrix word, when the power of love overcome the love of power, the world will know peace. Let us hope Zardari and Manmohan Singh will hear the strumming sound of guitar, not gun, in their waking stage of walk in their corridor!
(Frank Huzur is a New-Delhi-based poet, playwright and journalist. He is the authorized biographer of Pakistan legendary cricket captain and Tehreek-e-Insaf leader Imran Khan. His book, Imran versus Imran-An Untold Story will be published in March 2009 from Falcon and Falcon Books Ltd. London.)