Wednesday, June 9, 2010
‘Switch OFF’ Your Cell Phone for 12 Hours on June 10, 2010
Now we have to pay 15% on card recharge and more than 16% is the tax on each call. Almost 33% goes to government unjustified as its not the product of the government.
It is therefore requested to all cell phone users to switch off their cells for only 12 hours from 9 am to 9 pm on June 10, 2010.
Thursday, May 27, 2010
Jawed Karim
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Jawed Karim | |
|---|---|
Jawed Karim | |
| Born | 1979 Merseburg, East Germany |
| Ethnicity | Bengali-German |
| Website www.jawed.com | |
Jawed Karim (Bengali: জাওয়েদ করিম) (born 1979, East Germany) is a co-founder of the popular video sharing website YouTube. Many of the core components of PayPal, including its real-time anti-fraud system, were also designed and implemented by Karim.
Karim was born in Merseburg, East Germany, in 1979 and moved to West Germany in 1980. His father, Naimul Karim, is a Bangladeshi researcher at 3M. His mother, Christine Karim, is a German scientist and research associate professor of biochemistry at the University of Minnesota.[1] [2]
Karim grew up in Germany, and his family moved to the United States in 1992. He graduated from Central High School and attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.[3] He left campus prior to graduating to become an early employee at PayPal, but continued his coursework, earning his bachelor's degree in computer science in 2004.
While working at PayPal, he met Chad Hurley and Steve Chen. The three later founded the YouTube video sharing website in 2005.[4] YouTube's first video[5] was uploaded by Jawed on April 23, 2005.[6]
After co-founding the company and developing the YouTube concept and website with Chad Hurley and Steve Chen, Karim enrolled as a graduate student in computer science at Stanford University while acting as an advisor to YouTube.[7] When YouTube was acquired by Google, Karim received 137,443 shares of stock, worth about $64 million based on Google's closing stock price at the time.[8]
In October 2006, Jawed gave a lecture about the history of YouTube at the University of Illinois' annual ACM Conference entitled YouTube: From Concept to Hyper-growth[9]. The lecture material also contained pictures and videos of Jawed, Chad and Steve from the garage days of YouTube. Jawed returned again to the University of Illinois in May 2007 as the 136th and youngest Commencement Speaker in the school's history.[10][11]
More recently, Jawed has launched a venture fund called Youniversity Ventures, with the goal of helping current and former university students to launch their business ideas.
[edit] References
- ^ With YouTube, Student Hits Jackpot Again, The New York Times, October 12, 2006.
- ^ Surprise! There's a third YouTube co-founder, USA Today, October 11, 2006.
- ^ YouTube: OurGuys, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Department of Computer Science
- ^ Video websites pop up, invite postings, USA Today, November 21, 2005
- ^ YouTube's first video
- ^ jawed.com
- ^ YouTube Founders, YouTube.com
- ^ New York Times: YouTube’s Payoff: Hundreds of Millions for the Founders, The New York Times, February 7, 2007.
- ^ [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nssfmTo7SZg
- ^ Welcome to Engineering at Illinois, University of Illinois
- ^ 136th Commencement Address, University of Illinois, May 13, 2007.
[edit] External links
- Jawed Karim's Personal Website
- Jawed's YouTube Profile
- YouTube: From Concept to Hyper-growth
- Youniversity Ventures
- With YouTube, Grad Student Hits Jackpot Again - New York Times (Oct 12, 2006)
- Surprise! There's a third YouTube co-founder - USA TODAY (Oct 12, 2006)
- Whiz Kid: Jawed Karim, a graduate of St. Paul Central - Star Tribune (Oct 13, 2006)
- He went off to college to make his fortune - The News-Gazette (Oct 16, 2006)
Friday, March 19, 2010
Of moneyed Hindus, Nawab sahib’s deadly post master & next finance minister

Wednesday, March 17, 2010
By By Mohammad Malick
ISLAMABAD: On Monday, Shahbaz Sharif’s arguably controversial remarks pertaining to the Taliban sparing Punjab provided fodder for animated discussion in the House. On Tuesday, the parliamentary anger mills were fed by another Sharif. This time, no less than the honourable Chief Justice of Lahore High Court, Khwaja Mohammad Sharif.
His remark about “Hindus” giving money and the Muslim militants using it to carry out terrorist activities while hearing a case made the Hindu and other minority parliamentarians cry out an anguished Hi Bhagwan and led to what must be the first ever parliamentary boycott of a sitting chief justice of a high court.
We have seen a lot of strange things happen in our exceptionally colourful chequered political history but never before a walkout of such a nature. In a desperate bid to do some instant damage control, a rather unconvincing Syed Khurshid Shah wanted the House to believe that the honourable CJ must have meant to say “Hindustan and not just Hindu”, adding: “It was apparently a slip of tongue.” But Ramesh Laal wasn’t buying and making a speech before his protest walkout said that the honourable chief justice should have talked about a country but not about a religion. On hearing this one of the chaps sitting in the press gallery quipped: “If nothing else, a judge must be able to judge his own words.”
A tad harsh assessment but not altogether without merit. It wasn’t as if Muslim MNAs weren’t in a supporting mood for their minority colleagues. Rasheed Akbar Niwani of the PML-N wanted the judges to “speak through judgements and not otherwise”, while Munawar Talpur apologised to the Hindu MNAs whom he described as “as good a Pakistani as anyone else”.
It is inconceivable that the honourable chief justice would deliberately want to hurt the feelings of the hundreds of thousands of Hindu Pakistanis but still, exceptional care must be exhibited by men of stature, particularly those whose word is literally the law, to avoid strengthening any negative stereotyping of religious and ethnic minority groups in particular.
We already have enough impure divisive fissures in our so called land of the pure, and the last thing we need is further alienation of the population that is already being treated as aliens most of the time.
Talking of aliens, there was also talk about the real aliens in our midst. You know the type? The one which believes that they landed here from Mars to rule us and profit from our miseries. Yep, I am talking about our bountiful bureaucrats.
Humayun Saifullah wanted the government to take notice of the report of The News revealing the details of the unlawful arbitrary ‘discretionary’ granting of contracts worth almost 100 billion rupees by the National Highway Authority.
In an understandably irritated tone, he informed the House-not that anyone was listening and even the prime minister was busy signing away a zillion applications of MNAs making a bee line to his seat- of the deliberate delays in allowing a vital amendment to be made to the powers of the Public Procurement Rules Authority.
He disclosed that the House committee dealing with the matter had recommended that the PPRA’s power to grant exemption to rules must be withdrawn. And would you believe when this simple recommendation was made? More than six months back but trust the baboos to ensure that it does not get enacted.
In a man’s world, discretion thy name is valour but in that of a bureaucrat: discretion thy name is wealth (and lots of it).
But the most amazing part of the whole episode was that near the end of his short lament, Humayun Saifullah literally shouted: “Is anyone listening? Will anyone in the government answer me?” and not a single minister or a treasury member even bothered feigning attentiveness, let alone offer any response.
Humayun had a point as he looked towards the prime minister since all authorities are controlled by the cabinet division which in turn is under the direct supervision of the prime minister.
But the PM was simply too busy signing away. Tragically warped priorities, is all one can say. Talking of confusions and tragedies, it wasn’t as if the House didn’t have its funny moments. So what if they bordered on the edge of being ludicrous.
How about a real aging Nawab eating his heart over an insolent post master of a little town? Funny nah? Because that is exactly what happened today. I am personally very fond of Nawab Yousaf Talpur. He is a good man, like they say but apparently things have started to slip a bit I’m afraid.
The old Nawab stood there a whole good fifteen minutes or so venting his ire against the post master of Umar Kot. Yeah, you read it right, the post master of Umar Kot.
Nawab sahib, though he didn’t say as such, clearly wanted him to be tied to the back of a chariot and dragged through the dusty streets of Umar Kot for daring to “damage” the reputation of the mighty government both by misappropriating moneys being sent under the Benazir Income Support Fund and also “returning” money orders intended for the needy.
What he would gain by returning, Nawab sahib didn’t elaborate. But imagine one puny post master threatening the survival of the majestic PPP government. This man must be seen and in case my column goes missing over the next couple of days you should know that I shall be in Umar Kot to meet the deadly post master.
FOOTNOTE: In the coming days I shall bare the explosive details of a multi-billion dollar scam against Pakistan but let me share just one thing in advance that it happened on the watch of one man who is being seriously considered to watch over the national kitty as the country’s next finance minister. So keep your fingers closed and pray hard.
Tuesday, August 25, 2009
4 Youth Prisons in New York Used Excessive Force *
Excessive physical force was routinely used to discipline children at several juvenile prisons in New York, resulting in broken bones, shattered teeth, concussions and dozens of other serious injuries over a period of less than two years, a federal investigation has found.
A report by the United States Department of Justice highlighted abuses at four juvenile residential centers and raised the possibility of a federal takeover of the state’s entire youth prison system if the problems were not quickly addressed.
The report, made public on Monday, came 18 months into a major effort by state officials to overhaul New York’s troubled juvenile prison system, which houses children convicted of criminal acts, from truancy to murder, who are too young to serve in adult jails and prisons.
Investigators found that physical force was often the first response to any act of insubordination by residents, who are all under 16, despite rules allowing force only as a last resort.
“Staff at the facilities routinely used uncontrolled, unsafe applications of force, departing from generally accepted standards,” said the report, which was given to Gov. David A. Paterson on Aug. 14.
“Anything from sneaking an extra cookie to initiating a fistfight may result in a full prone restraint with handcuffs,” the reportsaid. “This one-size-fits-all approach has, not surprisingly, led to an alarming number of serious injuries to youth, including concussions, broken or knocked-out teeth, and spiral fractures” (bone fractures caused by twisting).
In a statement issued on Monday, Gladys Carrión, the commissioner of the Office of Children and Family Services, which oversees the juvenile prisons, said that the administration had inherited a youth justice system “rife with substantial systemic problems” but acknowledged that efforts to overhaul it had so far fallen short.
“We have made great strides,” said Ms. Carrión, “but much more still needs to be done.”
In one case described in the report, a youth was forcibly restrained and handcuffed after refusing to stop laughing when ordered to; the youth sustained a cut lip and injuries to the wrists and elbows. Workers forced one boy, who had glared at a staff member, into a sitting position and secured his arms behind his back with such force that his collarbone was broken.
Another youth was restrained eight times in three months despite signs that she might have been contemplating suicide. “In nearly every one of the eight incidents,” the report found, “the youth was engaged in behaviors such as head banging, putting paper clips in her mouth, tying a string around her neck, etc.”
The four centers cited in the report are the Lansing Residential Center and the Louis Gossett Jr. Residential Center in Lansing, and two residences, one for boys and one for girls, at Tryon Residential Center in Johnstown.
Officials at the centers also routinely failed to follow state rules requiring reviews whenever force is used, the report said. In some cases, the same staff member involved in an episode conducted the review of it. And even when a review determined that excessive force had been used, the staff members responsible sometimes faced no punishment.
In one case, a youth counselor with a documented record of using excessive force was recommended for firing after throwing a youth to the ground with such force that stitches were required on the youth’s chin. But after the counselor’s union intervened, the punishment was downgraded to a letter of reprimand, an $800 fine and a two-week suspension that was itself suspended.
The federal inquiry began in December 2007 following a spate of incidents at some of the 28 state-run juvenile residential centers, which house about 1,000 youths.
In November 2006, an emotionally disturbed teenager, Darryl Thompson, 15, died after two employees at the Tryon center pinned him down on the ground. The death was ruled a homicide, but a grand jury declined to indict the workers. The boy’s mother is suing the state.
During the same period, a separate joint investigation by the state inspector general and the Tompkins County district attorney found that the independent ombudsman’s office charged with overseeing youth prison centers had virtually ceased to function. In a report by Human Rights Watch and the American Civil Liberties Union issued in September 2006, New York’s youth residential centers were rated among the worst in the world.
Those scandals spurred a drive within Ms. Carrión’s department to overhaul the system. It reconstituted the ombudsman’s office and issued clearer policies on the use of physical force, leading to a sharp drop in instances where restraints were applied.
Under the overhaul, officials have also sought to close underused centers and redirect resources to counseling and other services, though they have faced fierce resistance from public employees’ unions and their allies in the Legislature. A task force appointed last year by Mr. Paterson is set to issue further recommendations by the end of this year.
“The problem is the unions and some of the staff they represent,” said Mishi Faruquee, director of Youth Justice Programs at the Children’s Defense Fund-New York, and a member of the task force. “They are very entrenched in the way they do things and the way they have been trained to do their jobs,” she said. “They have been very resistant to changing the policy on the use of force.”
In a statement, Stephen A. Madarasz, director of communications for the Civil Service Employees Union, which represents many of the workers at the centers, said union officials had not had an opportunity to review the full report.
The federal report revealed that despite efforts to overhaul the system, problems at some of the centers remained so severe that residents’ constitutional rights were being violated. Under federal law, New York has 49 days to respond with a plan of action to comply with the report’s recommendations.
If the state fails to do so, the Justice Department can initiate a lawsuit that could result in a federal takeover of the state’s juvenile prison system.
Even as the four centers singled out in the report relied excessively on physical force, federal investigators found, they failed to provide youths with adequate counseling and mental health treatment, something the vast majority of residents require. Three-quarters of children entering New York’s youth justice system have drug or alcohol problems, more than half have diagnosed psychological problems and a third have developmental disabilities, according to figures published by Office of Children and Family Services.
“The majority of psychiatric evaluations at the four facilities did not come close to meeting” professional standards, investigators determined, and “typically lacked basic, necessary information.”






